[an error occurred while processing this directive]
BBC News
watch One-Minute World News
Last Updated: Monday, 25 September 2006, 21:09 GMT 22:09 UK
Tobacco firms sued over low tar
Experts say low tar cigarettes are just as bad for health
A lawsuit which accuses tobacco firms of duping smokers into thinking low tar or "light" cigarettes are less harmful has been given the go ahead in the US.

Federal judge Jack Weinstein has ruled that the case can proceed as a class action, involving potentially tens of millions of plaintiffs.

Experts estimate that if successful, the case could cost the tobacco industry up to $200bn (105bn).

Defendants include Philip Morris, RJ Reynolds and British American Tobacco.

They [the cigarette firms] understood that they were selling death
Attorney Michael Hausfeld

They are joined by Lorillard Tobacco and Liggett Group.

Low tar cigarettes were introduced in the 1970s.


Spokesmen for Reynolds American, parent company of RJ Reynolds, and UK company British American Tobacco said each would now be appealing the judge's decision.

The appeal is likely to last up to a year.

Altria, parent of Marlboro-maker Philip Morris, said the ruling could see it delay the spin off of its Kraft Foods unit.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs argue that the tobacco companies in question reaped between $120bn to $200bn in extra sales through the deception that light cigarettes are less harmful than full strength versions.

"They [the cigarette firms] understood that they were selling death," said attorney Michael Hausfeld.

The question, he added, was "how to disguise it...They put on 'lights'."

Defence attorneys had argued that the lawsuit relied on flawed data.

They also said that without surveying each and every smoker in the lawsuit it would be impossible to determine their motives for buying light cigarettes.

The link between smoking and lung cancer was first confirmed in 1954.

British American Tobacco said that to date there have been 60 class actions cases against tobacco companies in the US and none have been successful.

The plaintiffs' lawyer explains the case

A safer alternative to smoking?
10 Jun 06 |  Health
Timeline: Smoking and disease
26 Oct 05 |  Health
Smoking curbs: The global picture
26 Oct 05 |  Special Reports
Tobacco giants hail court ruling
05 Feb 05 |  Business
Bihar bans chewing tobacco
01 Apr 03 |  South Asia

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

Has China's housing bubble burst?
How the world's oldest clove tree defied an empire
Why Royal Ballet principal Sergei Polunin quit


Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific