| You are in: Business | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]()
|
Monday, 22 November, 1999, 22:20 GMT
Microsoft faces civil suits
A civil lawsuit has been filed in California which threatens to cost the US software giant, Microsoft, billions of dollars. The action follows the anti-trust ruling two weeks ago that Microsoft has abused its dominant position in the market.
The case, which does not specify how much Microsoft should be fined, asks that the court triple any punitive damages awarded in the case, according to one lawyer involved. Another has estimated that the suit could represent more than 10 million computer users in California. Legal experts say they believe the preliminary ruling by District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson in the anti-trust case has made the climate ideal for a series of civil suits against Microsoft. "This could be a race to get to the courthouse," lawyer Stephen Axinn told the New York Times. 'Intimidation' Last week, a lawyer in New Orleans filed a suit seeking to represent millions of Windows 98 users across the US. It alleges that Microsoft used intimidation to reduce consumer choice and inflate the prices of its products. Drawing on Judge Jackson's ruling, it cites a Microsoft study that found the company could make a profit by charging customers $49 for a Windows 98 upgrade - but nevertheless set the market price at $89. Another suit has been filed by a New York advertising firm on behalf of thousands of consumers in the area. Microsoft has argued that, because its operating systems were usually sold pre-installed on PCs, any alleged abuse of power could not have affected consumers directly. Finding the facts Judge Jackson took the unusual step of separating his findings of fact from the findings of law in the case - giving the opportunity for civil suits to be filed now on the basis of his findings of fact. Given that they so strongly supported the government's position, most legal experts believe his final verdict - the findings of law - will rule that Microsoft was indeed in violation of the law. This could then open the way for the civil suits to proceed - costing Microsoft billions of dollars in damages. This threat is expected to make Microsoft keen to reach an out-of-court settlement in the anti-trust case. |
Links to other Business stories are at the foot of the page.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Links to more Business stories
|
|
|
^^ Back to top News Front Page | World | UK | UK Politics | Business | Sci/Tech | Health | Education | Entertainment | Talking Point | In Depth | AudioVideo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII | News Sources | Privacy |
|