Europe South Asia Asia Pacific Americas Middle East Africa BBC Homepage World Service Education
BBC Homepgaelow graphics version | feedback | help
BBC News Online
 You are in: Business: The Company File
Front Page 
World 
UK 
UK Politics 
Business 
Market Data 
Economy 
Companies 
Your Money 
Business Basics 
Sci/Tech 
Health 
Education 
Sport 
Entertainment 
Talking Point 
In Depth 
Audio/Video 
Saturday, 6 November, 1999, 03:24 GMT
Analysis: Ruling brings settlement closer
A happy government side after the verdict

By BBC News Online's Kevin Anderson

The US judge hearing the government's case against Microsoft went much further than legal experts had expected.

Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson did not issue his verdict in the case, but his findings of fact were highly critical of Microsoft and sided with the government on several key points.

"Through its conduct toward Netscape, IBM, Compaq, Intel, and others, Microsoft has demonstrated that it will use its prodigious market power and immense profits to harm any firm that insists on pursuing initiatives that could intensify competition against one of Microsoft's core products," he wrote.

"The ultimate result is that some innovations that would truly benefit consumers never occur for the sole reason that they do not coincide with Microsoft's self-interest," he said.

Judge Jackson's ruling surprised lawyers
In issuing a separate finding of fact before putting out his verdict, Judge Jackson has helped to make his ruling more appeal proof because appellate courts rarely reject a judge's findings of fact, legal experts say.

Legal experts had been expecting balanced findings of fact in an effort to encourage both sides to hammer out a settlement. But the strongly-worded decision might have the effect of bringing Microsoft to the negotiating table.

Microsoft might go as far as to agree to providing a robust set of assurances.

These could include the software giant pledging not to intimidate or attempt to control the behaviour of other software makers, internet service or content providers, or computer makers.

Seeking settlement

In statements after Judge Jackson's findings of fact, Microsoft executives, including Bill Gates, said that the company would like to put this case behind them.


"We remain committed to resolving these issues in a fair and responsible manner as quickly as possible," Mr Gates said.

Although eager for a settlement, Mr Gates said that the company will continue to protect its right to "innovate in our products."

But Microsoft and the states remain significantly apart in settlement talks.

The government and the 19 states that brought the antitrust case against Microsoft truly believe that they have the ideological high ground, says law professor William Kovacic, of George Washington University Law School.

Before the findings of fact, the government believed that it had the advantage in the case, and Judge Jackson's ruling only reinforced their confidence.

Possible remedies

The government had made it clear before the release of the findings of fact that it would seek what Mr Kovacic characterised as "nuclear-weapon type remedies."


Those remedies include breaking up the company, or forcing the company to license the Windows source code to other companies, allowing other software makers to market other versions of the Windows operating system.

"That's an anathema to Microsoft," Mr Kovacic said. There is a middle ground, he adds.

The government could agree to a robust set of assurances from the software giant that they would not intimidate or attempt to control the behaviour of other software makers, Internet Service Providers or computer makers.

But the states believe that these conduct-based solutions are much too mild, he said.

If a settlement is to be had, the two sides will both have to make compromises. Compromises that they have both been reluctant to make thus far.

Search BBC News Online

Advanced search options
Launch console
BBC RADIO NEWS
BBC ONE TV NEWS
WORLD NEWS SUMMARY
PROGRAMMES GUIDE

See also:
06 Nov 99 |  The Company File
Judge's ruling in excerpts
29 Mar 99 |  Microsoft
Microsoft's monopoly: the charge sheet
05 Nov 99 |  Microsoft
Microsoft vs US Justice Dept
19 Oct 99 |  The Company File
Computer craze boosts Microsoft
05 Nov 99 |  Microsoft
Timeline: Microsoft legal wrangles

Internet links:

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites