[an error occurred while processing this directive]
BBC News
watch One-Minute World News
Last Updated: Thursday, 30 March 2006, 10:22 GMT 11:22 UK
Nuclear clean-up 'to cost 70bn'
Sellafield
The cost of cleaning up existing waste is higher than previously thought
The UK's nuclear waste clean-up programme could cost more than 70bn, according to the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA).

The authority's previous estimate of the cost was 56bn.

The news came as the government backed British Nuclear Fuels' (BNFL) plan to sell its specialist nuclear clean-up business British Nuclear Group (BNG).

The sale of BNG was a "positive strategic move", said BNFL's chief executive Michael Parker.

We don't think there's likely to be a shortage of bidders
NDA chairman Sir Anthony Cleaver

Trade and Industry Secretary Alan Johnson said he believed a competitive sale was in the best commercial interest for BNFL.

"By bringing in external expertise more quickly, it also contributes to improved clean-up performance for the NDA and is therefore good for the taxpayer," Mr Johnson said.

Commercial operations

NDA chairman, Sir Anthony Cleaver, said the cost for the nuclear clean-up itself - including decommissioning, the clean-up of existing waste and the running of existing operations until their planned closure dates - was estimated to be 62.7bn.

SITES FOR DECOMMISSION
Berkeley
Bradwell
Calder Hall
Capenhurst
Chapelcross
Culham
Dounreay
Dungeness A
Harwell
Hinkley Point A
Hunterston A
Oldbury
Sellafield
Sizewell A
Springfields
Trawsfynydd
Windscale
Winfrith
Wylfa
Source: NDA

Additional costs linked to contaminated land would drive up the total to about 72bn.

Much of the land contamination was "chemical, not nuclear, but it is a cost nonetheless", Sir Anthony said.

Some of the operations the NDA is committed to run, such as the Mox and Thorp fuel reprocessing plants at Sellafield and some waste storage facilities, generate an income which the NDA anticipates could total 14.3bn.

This income could cancel out the running costs of its commercial operations, thus reducing the overall decommissioning and clean-up cost to about 56bn, an NDA spokesman explained.

However, whereas the cost of running NDA's commercial operations is fixed, the income they generate fluctuate in line with volatile energy markets.

Moreover, the Thorp facility at Sellafield has been closed for a year following a leak last April. Such unpredictable occurrences threaten to disrupt NDA's revenue stream.

Private sector rivalry

Until now, the bulk of Britain's nuclear waste has been stored above ground at 37 sites across the UK.

RELATED LINKS

When measured by volume, 65% of Britain's total waste mountain is stored at Sellafield, which is owned by the NDA but operated by BNG.

Finding a long-term solution to dealing with Britain's existing nuclear waste is considered essential before any decision can be made about building new nuclear power plants in the UK.

Now the Government has approved the NDA's plans for the decommissioning and clean-up of its civil nuclear sites.

Decommissioning will be fast-tracked where possible in its strategy of making the reduction of high hazards a "key focus."

"We are confident that in light of what we know today, our approved Strategy provides the best approach - in terms of safety, cost efficiency and sustainability - to tackle the UK's historic 60-year nuclear legacy," said the NDA's chief executive Dr Ian Roxburgh.

Unpopular strategy

The sale of BNG has met with much opposition from workers.

"Our union is opposed to the sale of the British Nuclear Group in principle," said Amicus national officer Dougie Rooney.

"But we are also concerned that it could compromise the government's stated objectives of decommissioning civil nuclear sites in the UK at a reduced cost to the taxpayer and a reduced timescale while maintaining safety standards."

We consider that the proposal to privatise British Nuclear Group will set up a Railtrack in the nuclear industry
Gary Smith, GMB

The GMB union was equally critical.

"We consider that the proposal to privatise British Nuclear Group will set up a Railtrack in the nuclear industry," said Gary Smith, national officer at the GMB.

"Like Railtrack it will be dependent on public money, the private sector managers will look out for number one, and any corners cut could lead to a catastrophic mistake."

Environmentalists were also angry.

"Every time the costs of cleaning up nuclear sites are looked at, the cost for the taxpayer spirals," said Greenpeace nuclear campaigner Jean McSorley.

"It's just one more reason why it would be insane to countenance building more nuclear power plants across Britain."


RELATED INTERNET LINKS
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites



FEATURES, VIEWS, ANALYSIS
Has China's housing bubble burst?
How the world's oldest clove tree defied an empire
Why Royal Ballet principal Sergei Polunin quit

PRODUCTS & SERVICES

Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific