Shell's caution has cost it the support of investors
|
Oil and gas giant Shell has come under the spotlight of the US market watchdog following its recent admission that it overestimated its reserves.
The Securities & Exchange Commission has now upgraded its informal inquiry to a formal investigation, Shell said.
The group saw its shares slide 15% in January after it downgraded its proven oil reserves by a fifth.
The downgrade was itself partly the result of an SEC rule on how oil firms can define their stocks.
Definitions
In a statement, Shell said the inquiry would be a non-public one, and promised the SEC's investigators every co-operation.
The firm's defenders point out that the SEC's rulebook is itself part of the problem.
"Proven" reserves, it says, are those where oil has been drilled; as-yet untapped oil and gas fields are only "probable".
This distinction is nowhere near as rigid in other countries, and some say fails to take into account modern sound-based exploration - so-called seismic imaging - which does not require drilling to prove viability.
Action
But some disgruntled shareholders disagree, pointing out that no other oil firm has had to take such a swingeing downgrade.
They say the company had been over-optimistic, and blame current chief executive Sir Philip Watts - previously head of the group's exploration division - for the shortfall.
Several shareholders have launched lawsuits, saying the value of their holdings has fallen because of the firm's actions.