BBC NEWS Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific
BBCi NEWS   SPORT   WEATHER   WORLD SERVICE   A-Z INDEX     

BBC News World Edition
 You are in: Business  
News Front Page
Africa
Americas
Asia-Pacific
Europe
Middle East
South Asia
UK
Business
E-Commerce
Economy
Market Data
Entertainment
Science/Nature
Technology
Health
-------------
Talking Point
-------------
Country Profiles
In Depth
-------------
Programmes
-------------
BBC Sport
BBC Weather
SERVICES
-------------
EDITIONS
Wednesday, 12 February, 2003, 18:54 GMT
How falling stock markets affect you

The news from the stock markets has gone from bad to worse.

You might not think the falls affect you, but BBC News Online explains why you could lose out, even if you don't own any shares.

I'm not a stockbroker: Why should I care about falling share prices?

You may never have consciously bought or sold a share, but collapsing stock markets can still have a nasty effect on your wealth.

Many people are "indirect" investors in shares - in other words, their pensions and other savings schemes are tied up in the stock markets.

Over the past decade or so, share ownership has become much more widespread in the UK, especially since the mass privatisations of the 1980s.

And the prolonged stock market boom of the 1990s has seen many large pension funds shift a greater proportion of their holdings into stocks, and away from traditionally safer investments such as government bonds.

This is having unpleasant consequences.

Although people have some say in how their pension funds are invested, some big investment companies have started to slap heavy exit fees on clients who want to get out of the stock markets.

And although we have always been told that the returns from shares are better than those on bonds in the long term, that is not true at the moment.

What if I don't have a pension or other investments?

You are still at the mercy of the markets.

In the past few years, British companies have become ever more conscious of their share prices.

A low share value makes it harder for a company to operate - affecting its ability to raise money or complete acquisitions, for example.

That, combined with the rise of the shareholder culture, explains why companies will go to often drastic lengths to support their share price.

The most common measure is to cut costs - usually by shedding staff.

So a collapsing market could make your employer less successful - and it could cost you your job.

But what if I don't work at a company whose shares are listed on the stock market?

There's still no escape.

The stock markets have a far greater economic reach than they used to.

With so many people - directly or indirectly - having investments in the market, and corporate activity so easily influenced by share prices, a falling market sharply reduces the amount of general affluence in the economy.

People have far less cash to splash around in thin times, and prefer to keep their wealth locked up in the bank.

This directly affects consumer spending, and especially sensitive markets such as house prices.

In London, the most extreme case, the boom in house prices has been largely fuelled by personal wealth linked to buoyant investment performance.

In the longer term, it can harm a country's economic performance, leading to shrinking output and redundancies across the board.

In the United States, where share ownership is near-universal, the correlation between market performance and broad economic health is extremely close.

In Britain, we are a little shielded from this effect, but not wholly.

If it's so serious, why does no one do anything about it?

Who is going to intervene?

Many in the financial sector might like to see a bounce, but share traders can make money from a falling market almost as easily as from a boom.

And no bank is going to be happy to interfere with the mechanisms of the free market.

The government might seem a more likely white knight.

In the past, some governments around the world have been willing to push public money into the markets, in an effort to stave off collapse.

But that won't happen in the UK.

For a start, such interventions are rarely even temporarily successful, resulting in nothing more helpful than a massive state subsidy of the investment community - scarcely a sound political move.

More to the point, state intervention would represent a snub to the sort of free-market policies that almost all Western governments at least nominally follow.

Britain's economic partners would be profoundly offended at any attempt to tinker with the markets.

Pretty much everyone may be unhappy at the present state of affairs.

But like it or not, that's capitalism.


Analysis

IN DEPTH
The Markets: 9:29 UK
FTSE 100 5760.40 -151.7
Dow Jones 11380.99 -119.7
Nasdaq 2243.78 -28.9
FTSE delayed by 15 mins, Dow and Nasdaq by 20 mins
Launch marketwatch
View market data
Internet links:


The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

Links to more Business stories are at the foot of the page.


 E-mail this story to a friend

Links to more Business stories

© BBC ^^ Back to top

News Front Page | Africa | Americas | Asia-Pacific | Europe | Middle East |
South Asia | UK | Business | Entertainment | Science/Nature |
Technology | Health | Talking Point | Country Profiles | In Depth |
Programmes