BBC NEWS Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific Arabic Spanish Russian Chinese Welsh

 You are in:  Business
Front Page 
UK Politics 
Market Data 
Your Money 
Business Basics 
Talking Point 
In Depth 

Commonwealth Games 2002

BBC Sport

BBC Weather

Saturday, 23 February, 2002, 17:21 GMT
Judge grants Napster respite
Napster hopes to relaunch later this year
Song-swapping service Napster has been given more time to gather evidence before a ruling on a copyright lawsuit brought by the recording industry.

Napster founder Shawn Fanning
Napster alleges record companies deliberately colluded to put the service out of business
In a small victory for the company, which has been offline since July last year, US District judge Marilyn Hall Patel said more time was needed to decide who owned the rights to the music involved in the record industry's lawsuit against the company.

She also said that the potential harm to the public could be "massive" if recording companies were found to have acted in an anti-competitive manner.

"If Napster is correct, plaintiffs are attempting the near monopolisation of the digital distribution market," she said.

Settlement failure

Recording companies are seeking damages from Napster for allowing copyrighted songs by recording artists to be trafficked by users who were able to swap and download recorded material for free.

In a lawsuit filed in 1999, companies including AOL Time Warner, EMI and Bertelsmann alleged such software was cheating them out of royalties.

Bertlesmann has since joined forces with Napster and hopes to relaunch the site legally later this year.

Napster's allegations of misuse are without merit

RIAA lawyer Cary Sherman
Created by then 19-year-old student Shawn Fanning (Napster was his nickname at university), the service at one point swelled to more than 70 million users and now employs more than 50 people.

Napster counters that music labels deliberately misused their copyrights in order to dominate the relatively unchartered world of online music distribution and wanted Napster shut down purely so their own sites would face no other competition.

Ms Patel's ruling comes a month after a hearing where she delayed any prospective decision for 30 days, in the hope that both sides would reach an amicable settlement.

However, no agreement was reached and Ms Patel has since ordered both sides to submit all relevant documents to a court appointed expert for review.


Napster officials welcomed the ruling.

"We are pleased that the court granted Napster's request to examine two critical issues: the record companies' ownership of artists' copyrights and anti-competitive behaviour that amounts to misuse of their copyrights," said Napster general counsel Jonathan Schwartz.

However, representatives for the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), which is representing the recording companies involved, said that the judge's claims were baseless.

"Napster's allegations of misuse are without merit, as the discovery ordered by the court will confirm," Cary Sherman, a lawyer for the RIAA told French news agency AFP.

See also:

10 Jan 02 | New Media
Napster tests legal song-swap service
20 Feb 02 | New Media
Digital music deadline expires
24 Jan 02 | New Media
Napster wins time to settle
08 Feb 02 | New Media
Music industry's digital plans 'fail'
Internet links:

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

Links to more Business stories are at the foot of the page.

E-mail this story to a friend

Links to more Business stories