|low graphics version | feedback | help|
|You are in: Business|
Friday, 26 January, 2001, 12:53 GMT
The news from Davos has been dominated by tight security and fears about protests by anti-globalisation demonstators. BBC News Online has asked the president of the International Chamber of Commerce, Richard McCormick, and Barry Coates of the World Development Movement, to debate whether the protesters are right to target the World Economic Forum.
Why the Protesters are Wrong
by Richard D McCormick, President of the International Chamber of Commerce
The anti-globalisation, anti-business movement is at it again. If they fail to disrupt the World Economic Forum here in Davos, it won't be for want of trying - as the trail of noisy and sometimes violent protests from Seattle to Prague demonstrates.
The time has come for business to put the record straight. It's time for business to fight back.
It's time for business to move the debate away from the cheap sloganeering and mindless vandalism of the protesters in the streets and stand up and proclaim the benefits of globalisation.
For without it, the developing world and the millions in it who live in extreme poverty will lose the best chance they have of improving their lot in life.
Two years ago on this same platform at Davos, UN Secretary General Kofi Annan launched his Global Compact.
This year, he will use his appearance to give a progress report on this UN-business pact. He will doubtless point to growing momentum in support of his initiative among companies all over the world.
The premise is a simple one - business and the UN pursue complementary objectives. The UN focuses on peace and development, while the task of business is to create wealth and prosperity.
It's hard to have one without the other. Therefore business and the UN should, and do, work together in promoting the values they share in the areas of human rights, labour standards and environmental protection.
Force for good
Multinationals are a powerful force for good in the world. They spread wealth, work, technologies that raise living standards and better ways of doing business. That's why so many developing countries are competing fiercely to attract their investment.
The protesters in the streets descending on Davos are modern-day Luddites who want to make the world safe for stagnation.
They claim to worry about the well-being of the hundreds of millions of people in the developing world who are living in poverty. In reality, their resistance to globalisation and their hostility to business make them an enemy of the world's poor.
Maybe that's why people from developing countries are so rare in the ranks of the demonstrators.
The Case Against Business Globalisation
by Barry Coates, Director, World Development Movement
The power of the World Economic Forum in Davos comes from its influence over governments in shaping the global economy in the corporate interest.
Governments are told to follow two paths.
First, deregulate and privatise. This has been pursued in over 90 countries through structural adjustment policies of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund.
The bitter legacy is growing poverty in all regions of the developing world, except China.
Second, leave business to regulate itself.
Corporations have promised to adopt voluntary ethical standards in response to growing public concern over social and environmental damage.
But these have often been a public relations exercise to deflect criticism and the few companies that are implementing these standards compete at a disadvantage to the majority of companies that don't.
The Davos model
This is the Davos business model: unregulated, exclusive and beyond the reach of government.
WDM and other groups from developed and developing countries at Davos are holding an alternative forums that challenge this model and propose alternatives that prioritise poverty reduction, environmental sustainability and human rights.
Above all, they emphasise that it is the role of governments to regulate markets in the public interest.
Yet the pressure from business lobby groups is to regulate governments, not corporations, through international agreements.
These would remove restrictions on business to pursue profits in any industry, in any country, at any cost.
More free trade pacts
This is most evident in current trade negotiations under the auspices of the World Trade Organisation which aim to extend free trade in services.
It is not only external barriers to free trade that are under attack, but the power of governments to enact domestic regulation in the public interest.
At stake is the future of public services accessible to all.
At Davos, the most serious threat to the welfare of the world's poor comes not from those outside the conference hall, but from those inside.
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites
Top Business stories now:
Links to more Business stories are at the foot of the page.
Links to more Business stories
|^^ Back to top
News Front Page | World | UK | UK Politics | Business | Sci/Tech | Health | Education | Entertainment | Talking Point | In Depth | AudioVideo
To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>>
© MMIII | News Sources | Privacy