Languages
Page last updated at 21:17 GMT, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 22:17 UK

US Senate passes surveillance law

Man speaking on cellphone
Telephone companies were facing as many as 40 lawsuits

The US senate has passed a bill to shield telephone companies who helped in the White House's controversial warrantless wiretaps programme.

The bill also grants the US government the power to continue with the telephone surveillance scheme.

The Bush administration faced criticism when details emerged of its programme to monitor the phone calls of foreign targets in the US without warrants.

Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama voted in favour of the measure.

His decision to back the bill drew criticism from some of his supporters, who pointed to past statements in which Mr Obama had pledged to block any bill which granted immunity to telecommunication companies.

"I wouldn't have drafted the legislation like this," said Mr Obama, in a statement on his website.

However, he added, "in a dangerous world, government must have the authority to collect the intelligence we need to protect the American people".

Sticking point

President Bush welcomed the Senate's decision to pass the bill, saying he would be signing it into law shortly.

The bill was passed in the House of Representatives with bipartisan support last month, after House Democrats reached a compromise with the Republicans over the provisions to grant telecommunications companies immunity from prosecution.

Telephone companies were facing as many as 40 lawsuits for their involvement in the scheme.

US President George W Bush

Previous attempts to pass the bill - and allow the warrantless wiretap scheme to continue - had foundered on the issue of immunity for telecom firms.

Democrats had been reluctant to grant the firms immunity, saying the courts should first determine what the companies did.

President Bush - backed by Republicans in Congress - wanted to ensure that firms which had helped his administration would not be liable for prosecution.

The two sides reached a compromise, whereby telephone companies would not be automatically immune, but courts would be obliged to dismiss a suit against a firm if it is able to produce written certification that the White House had asked it to participate in the programme and had assured the firm it was legal.




SEE ALSO
US lawmakers pass wiretaps bill
20 Jun 08 |  Americas
US House passes surveillance law
15 Mar 08 |  Americas
Bush urges wiretap immunity law
28 Feb 08 |  Americas
Bush signs expanded wiretap law
06 Aug 07 |  Americas
Q&A: US surveillance row
19 Mar 08 |  Americas
US 'to end warrantless wiretaps'
17 Jan 07 |  Americas
US eavesdropping 'can continue'
05 Oct 06 |  Americas
US judge rules wiretaps illegal
18 Aug 06 |  Americas


FEATURES, VIEWS, ANALYSIS
Has China's housing bubble burst?
How the world's oldest clove tree defied an empire
Why Royal Ballet principal Sergei Polunin quit

BBC navigation

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.

Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific