Languages
Page last updated at 03:04 GMT, Saturday, 3 March 2007

New nuclear warhead design for US

A Trident missile (picture: US defence department)
US submarines currently rely on the Trident missile system

The Bush administration has selected the design for America's first new nuclear warhead in nearly two decades.

US officials say the warhead will not add to the country's nuclear arsenal, but will replace existing missiles.

Critics have complained it sends the wrong signal at a time when the White House is leading efforts to curb Iran and North Korea's nuclear ambitions.

The chosen design was developed in a Californian laboratory and is based on a warhead already tested in the 1980s.

The US Congress authorised design work on a new warhead in 2005 on the basis that there would not be any fresh missile tests.

No nuclear underground tests have been conducted since a ban in 1992.

The new warhead, due to be operational in five years' time, will be used to replace Trident missiles on submarines.

'No arms race'

Making the announcement, US officials said the plan was simply to replace older, less reliable warheads with a safer version.

"This is not about starting a new nuclear arms race," said Thomas P D'Agostino, acting head of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA).

Scientists at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory would now continue work on the design, costing and development of the programme, he said.

This could serve to encourage the very proliferation we are trying to prevent
Dianne Feinstein
Democratic Senator

However, says the BBC's Jamie Coomarasamy in Washington, at a moment when the White House is trying to stop North Korea and Iran developing their nuclear programmes, some see the decision to press ahead with a new US warhead as sending an unfortunate mixed message.

Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein was among the critics in Congress.

"The minute you begin to put more sophisticated nuclear warheads on the existing fleet, you are essentially creating a new nuclear weapon. And it's just a matter of time before other nations do the same," the Associated Press quotes her as saying.

"This could serve to encourage the very proliferation we are trying to prevent."

Nuclear non-proliferation groups have also criticised the move, warning that it could lead to proliferation and saying there is no need to replace the US' Cold War-era stockpile.

The NNSA has said the destruction of ageing warheads will mean that in five years' time, the number held by the US will be at its lowest since the 1950s.



SEE ALSO
Q&A: US missile defence
23 Feb 07 |  Americas
Q&A: Nuclear disarmament
29 May 10 |  Special Reports
Russia upgrades nuclear missiles
05 Dec 06 |  Europe
Trident decision has international impact
04 Dec 06 |  UK Politics
Putin unveils 'new super missile'
31 Jan 06 |  Europe

RELATED INTERNET LINKS
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites


FEATURES, VIEWS, ANALYSIS
Has China's housing bubble burst?
How the world's oldest clove tree defied an empire
Why Royal Ballet principal Sergei Polunin quit

BBC navigation

BBC © 2013 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.

Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific