| You are in: World: Americas | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Thursday, 2 December, 1999, 18:17 GMT
Seattle police tactics under scrutiny
Images of black-suited riot police firing tear gas and rounding up protesters on the streets and have cast a dramatic shadow over the Seattle meeting of the World Trade Organisation.
The Seattle Police Department (SPD) says it was caught off-guard by the protesters' actions and admits it failed to undertake an adequate "threat analysis" ahead of the gathering. On reflection, said SPD Chief Ron Stamper, there were more violent protesters than "anybody could have predicted." Warnings given
They insist they had given warnings that a hardcore of protesters would inevitably try to take more direct, violent action. "I made it very clear that there were lots of groups coming to Seattle, over which I wouldn't have any control" said Mike Dolan, one of the main protest organisers. He says the police told him they were confident they could handle the protesters. Change of plan
On Tuesday it quickly became apparent that that would not be enough. Small groups of protesters broke off from the main march and set about laying into symbols of American corporate culture - Starbucks coffee shops, Gap clothing stores and Bank of America branches bore the brunt. With government ministers blocked from leaving their hotels, forcing WTO officials to cancel the talks' opening ceremony, a change of tactics was needed.
According to some local media reports, stun grenades were fired at the crowds without warning. Critics say the police response was excessive and indiscriminate, targeting non-violent as well as violent protesters. "It didn't make any sense" one protester told the Seattle Times. "They gassed us to move us back five or six feet." "When this stuff was happening they didn't do anything," he said pointing to the broken shop fronts. No protest zone
The move was criticised by civil liberties groups who said the protest ban violated constitutional rights.
By that time police had bolstered their ranks with hundreds of unarmed National Guardsmen and Washington State Patrol troopers - the gentle approach, they said, had failed. On balance most Americans are likely to give the police the benefit of the doubt and blame a small minority of troublemakers for sparking what is already being called the "Battle for Seattle". But for those who had hoped to portray Seattle as an easy-going city, built on the American ideals of free speech and expression, the images of armour clad police fighting a pitched battle with unarmed protesters will be hard to erase. |
Links to other Americas stories are at the foot of the page.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Links to more Americas stories
|
|
|
^^ Back to top News Front Page | World | UK | UK Politics | Business | Sci/Tech | Health | Education | Entertainment | Talking Point | In Depth | AudioVideo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII | News Sources | Privacy |
|