![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tuesday, October 5, 1999 Published at 00:27 GMT 01:27 UK World: Americas Future clouded for GM crops in US? ![]() The future for GM crops in America is suddenly looking less certain By the BBC's Gavin Hewitt These are lean times across the Cornbelt. Grain prices are the lowest in memory, and some farmers are facing an additional problem. The international market for genetically-modified crops is collapsing. Farmers like Dennis Mitchell from South Dakota believed GM crops were the way of the future but now he's less sure. "If the customer ultimately says they don't want it, I'll have to rethink what I'm planting," Mr Mitchell said. Whilst they have been harvesting in the American heartland, the news has only got worse.
The confidence of those farmers who had switched to growing GM crops was further undermined when Archers Daniels Midland, the largest grain exporter in Illinois, instructed farmers that GM grain and conventional grain must be segregated at the silos. Tim Galvin of the Department of Agriculture says these are disturbing times for many farmers. "In some cases, (farmers) have reacted with surprise and concern, too. Especially if the segregation results in two prices," Mr Galvin said. On the trade floor in Chicago there is already an expectation that GM crops will fetch a lower price than conventional grains.
"Many (farmers) are going to be going back to conventional crops out of the uncertainty ... whether they will go through the risk and expense of planting a crop and then not having it marketable next harvest," he said. He said that the companies that developed GM crops have only themselves to blame. "They should have done a better job of explaining the science, doing the research, educating the consumer, and they didn't." Crops in the courts And the doubts about GM, expressed so volubly abroad, have encouraged a variety of groups in the United States to turn to the courts to slow the genetic revolution.
"There is a great deal of momentum within the international community that is coming together to oppose what is going on. We are hearing from groups in Europe, Africa and Japan, who are very, very concerned," he said. Mr Kelley argues that the large biotechnology companies have become too powerful and that they have so engineered GM crops that the farmers have to return each year to the company to buy their seeds. They believe this is anti-competitive and are seeking billions of dollars in damages, arguing that GM seeds are fundamentally different from anything that has gone before. "It was said to me by a Swedish farmer the other night that farmers since the beginning of civilisation have been able to sow their own seeds, and the practices being introduced and enforced by the bio-tech industry are threatening that practice," Mr Kelley said.
Joe Mendleson from the Centre for Food Safety believes you cannot have international consumers being given this information and not Americans. "I have no doubt that the crisis and the issue that is embroiling Europe right now is going to spread to the United States. I think it's already here," he said. Clouded future It is too early to write off the genetic food revolution. The promise remains of future food designed to improve nutrition or health and so far, American consumers remain untroubled by the whole issue. But recently the largest baby food manufacturer in the United States announced it would no longer use GM ingredients. The company insisted it was not an issue of safety. It just wanted to position itself ahead of public opinion. In just a short period, the future for GM crops has become far less certain. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||