[an error occurred while processing this directive]
BBC News
watch One-Minute World News
Languages
Last Updated: Tuesday, 29 June, 2004, 21:35 GMT 22:35 UK
US court bars internet porn law
Two young girls surfing the net
The law was passed in 1998 but never came into effect
The US Supreme Court has narrowly ruled that a law meant to protect children from online pornography is probably an infringement of free speech.

Five of the court's nine judges opposed the law, which was passed in 1998 and is backed by the Bush administration.

The majority said a lower court was right to block it, as it may have violated the First Amendment of the US Constitution on freedom of speech.

The case has been sent back to a lower court for a trial.

A new trial will allow the court to discuss any technological developments that may permit adults to see and buy legal material - while keeping it away from children.

Registration

The law, known as the Child Online Protection Act (COPA), was signed by then-President Bill Clinton in 1998, but blocked by a federal judge five years ago.

The court yet again opposed these common-sense measures to protect America's children
Mark Corallo
US Justice Department
It would have required adults to use a form of online registration to access objectionable material.

The law would have allowed fines of up to $50,000 for placing material that is "harmful to minors" within easy reach on the web.

Filtering software "is not a perfect solution to the problem of children gaining access to harmful-to-minors materials," Justice Anthony Kennedy stated.

The American Civil Liberties Union and other critics of the law argued it would restrict too much material that adults might legally see and buy.

"By preventing Attorney General [John] Ashcroft from enforcing this questionable federal law, the Court has made it safe for artists, sex educators, and web publishers to communicate with adults about sexuality without risking jail time," ACLU Associate Legal Director Ann Beason said in a statement in reaction to the decision.

But Stephen Breyer, one of the four dissenting judges, said prosecutors had been deprived of an "important weapon".

Long battle

Justice Department spokesman Mark Corallo also criticised the decision.

"Our society has reached a broad consensus that child obscenity is harmful to our youngest generation and must be stopped," he said.

"Congress has repeatedly attempted to address this serious need, and the court yet again opposed these common-sense measures to protect America's children."

This is the third time that the Supreme Court has addressed the question of what Congress may do to limit children's exposure to pornography on the internet.

In 1997, the court struck down a broader law, the 1996 Communications Decency Act (CDA), as a violation of the First Amendment, the newspaper said.

COPA attempted to fix the CDA's constitutional defects, but it too was found unconstitutional in 2000 by an appeals court.

In 2002, a divided Supreme Court told the court to reconsider its decision. But last year, the same court struck down the law again - and the Bush administration appealed the case once more to the Supreme Court.




SEE ALSO:
US court revisits net porn law
14 Oct 03  |  Technology
US porn-filter law upheld
23 Jun 03  |  Americas
US court to rule on net porn
06 Mar 03  |  Americas
US net porn law overturned
31 May 02  |  Science/Nature


RELATED INTERNET LINKS:
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites


PRODUCTS AND SERVICES

News Front Page | Africa | Americas | Asia-Pacific | Europe | Middle East | South Asia
UK | Business | Entertainment | Science/Nature | Technology | Health
Have Your Say | In Pictures | Week at a Glance | Country Profiles | In Depth | Programmes
Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific