[an error occurred while processing this directive]
BBC News
watch One-Minute World News
LANGUAGES
Spanish
Brasil
Caribbean
Last Updated: Saturday, 13 September, 2003, 22:27 GMT 23:27 UK
Nike settles 'free speech' court case
Nike shop
The merits of each side's case remain untested
The sportswear manufacturer, Nike, has agreed to pay $1.5m to settle a lawsuit in the United States over statements it made about working conditions in some of its suppliers' Asian factories.

Marc Kasky, a San Francisco labour activist, had sued the company five years ago, accusing it of false advertising for claiming it was protecting labour rights at factories that make footwear for Nike.

He alleged that a Nike public relations campaign was misleading about the conditions for its Vietnamese, Chinese and Indonesian workers. Nike denied the allegations.

The money will go to a monitoring group called the Fair Labor Association (FLA) to improve factory conditions and monitoring.

The FLA is a group coalition of companies, including Nike and its competitors Reebok and Adidas, NGOs and universities, which promotes a code of conduct based on international labour standards, monitors labour practices and co-ordinates public reports on factory conditions.

In return, Mr Kasky is to withdraw his lawsuit that accused Nike of false advertising in a publicity campaign designed to refute claims that its products were made in sweatshop conditions.

"The two parties mutually agreed that investments designed to strengthen workplace monitoring and factory worker programmes are more desirable than prolonged litigation," Nike said Friday in a statement announcing the agreement.

Correspondents say the settlement means that the merits of each side's case remain untested.

Supreme Court ruling

The case revolved around the question of whether Nike subcontractors in Vietnam, China and Indonesia run sweatshops to manufacture its athletic products.

The California Supreme Court had ruled that Mr Kasky could sue Nike on the false advertising claim, prompting the company to ask for a review by the US Supreme Court.

But after hearing oral arguments, the high court refused to tackle the issues and dismissed the case in June, leaving the decision up to California.

Many had hoped the Supreme Court would settle the issue; the case was expected to set precedent.




SEE ALSO:
Nike 'free speech' appeal rejected
26 Jun 03  |  Americas
Nike 'free speech' challenged
23 Apr 03  |  Americas
Nike 'free speech' case in court
23 Apr 03  |  Americas
Spotlight on Indonesian 'sweat shops'
07 Mar 02  |  Asia-Pacific
Oxfam condemns sportswear giants
07 Mar 02  |  Asia-Pacific


RELATED INTERNET LINKS:
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites


PRODUCTS AND SERVICES

News Front Page | Africa | Americas | Asia-Pacific | Europe | Middle East | South Asia
UK | Business | Entertainment | Science/Nature | Technology | Health
Have Your Say | In Pictures | Week at a Glance | Country Profiles | In Depth | Programmes
Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific