BBC NEWS Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific Spanish Portuguese Caribbean
BBCi NEWS   SPORT   WEATHER   WORLD SERVICE   A-Z INDEX     

BBC News World Edition
 You are in: Americas  
News Front Page
Africa
Americas
Asia-Pacific
Europe
Middle East
South Asia
UK
Business
Entertainment
Science/Nature
Technology
Health
-------------
Talking Point
-------------
Country Profiles
In Depth
-------------
Programmes
-------------
BBC Sport
BBC Weather
SERVICES
-------------
LANGUAGES
EDITIONS
Wednesday, 5 February, 2003, 21:59 GMT
Americans weigh Iraq evidence
Colin Powell at the UN Security Council
Powell had several audiences to convince

US Secretary of State Colin Powell had several audiences in mind when he addressed the UN on Wednesday concerning Iraq.

He was trying to convince other members of the Security Council that Iraq was in material breach of UN resolution 1441, laying the groundwork for a possible further resolution.

He met very well the challenge of talking directly about why we believe this is a threat

David Kay, former weapons inspector
He was trying to convince members of Congress in Washington - some of whom have asked for more evidence - of the need for urgent action.

And most importantly, he was addressing the American public, trying to lay out the case against Iraq in terms that would command widespread public support.

And polls suggest that the public, by a margin of 63% to 24%, has more confidence in Mr Powell than President Bush when it comes to deciding what to do about Iraq.

Presenting the evidence

Mr Powell's powerful but legalistic case, complete with photographic evidence and intercepted conversations, has impressed the experts.

Osama Bin Laden is either dead or on the run
Iraq's alleged links to Osama Bin Laden could be crucial
The most chilling moment came when he held up a vial which could have contained anthrax, to show the size of Iraq's biological weapons programme.

David Kay, a former chief weapons inspector, told US television networks that Mr Powell had made a convincing case.

"He met very well the challenge of talking directly about why we believe this is a threat," he said.

And Ken Pollack, a former White House adviser on Iraq, said that there was "far more evidence" than Mr Powell was able to lay out.

Political debate

But the presentation may not have changed many minds among politicians.

It was not clear that Mr Powell's case would change many minds among the public

Senator Edward Kennedy, who has been urging the Senate to vote on its own resolution before committing American troops, renewed his warning that the US might be in more danger from terrorism if an invasion went ahead.

And he said that the case was not made linking Iraq to al-Qaeda, noting that al-Qaeda operates in many countries.

However, key Democrat and former vice-presidential candidate Joe Lieberman gave Mr Powell his full backing. And, his rival Senator John Kerry said that "Secretary Powell made a compelling case".

Republican House majority leader Tom DeLay attacked dissenters as unpatriotic.

"I don't think any amount of evidence will ever the convince the appeasers that Saddam has to be taken out," he said.

Cuban missile crisis echoes

The early evidence suggests that the speech was not gripping the public in the way that the UN speech of Adlai Stevenson gripped the nation 40 years ago during the Cuban Missile Crisis, when Mr Kennedy's older brother was president.

Then, Mr Stevenson electrified the world with his charge - backed up by photographic evidence - that the Soviet Union had installed medium range missiles in Cuba.

There were fewer people watching Mr Powell live at the UN this time, and for all the worries about terrorism and weapons of mass destruction, the direct threat to the United States seemed far more distant.

The event was not broadcast live on all the main television networks, only on the cable news stations, leaving many Americans to get their interpretation of the testimony from the evening news or the morning newspapers.

And it was not clear that Mr Powell's case would change many minds among the public, many of whom have been debating the Iraq issue for months.

One taxi driver told BBC News Online that he believed the war in Iraq was wrong, and aimed at gaining US control of the oil fields.

A Georgetown student, however, said he was convinced by the evidence that Saddam was a much more serious threat than he had thought.

Even Mr Bush's State of the Union speech last month, which concentrated heavily on the evil nature of Iraq, and was widely publicised, only added a few percentage points to public support for military action against Iraq.

Recent polls suggest that between 53% and 58% of Americans would support that option, but most also favour working through the United Nations.

But there is one element which weighs most heavily with the public.

Over 90% of the public say that if a link between that al-Qaeda and Iraq could be proved, that would justify a war.

So it may be that part of Mr Powell's speech which will prove to be the most important element of his presentation.

 WATCH/LISTEN
 ON THIS STORY
Democratic Congressman Jim McDermott
"You have to ask why they held this back all this time"

Key stories

Analysis

CLICKABLE GUIDE

BBC WORLD SERVICE

AUDIO VIDEO

TALKING POINT
See also:

05 Feb 03 | Middle East
04 Feb 03 | Middle East
27 Jan 03 | Americas
26 Jan 03 | Americas
Internet links:


The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

Links to more Americas stories are at the foot of the page.


 E-mail this story to a friend

Links to more Americas stories

© BBC ^^ Back to top

News Front Page | Africa | Americas | Asia-Pacific | Europe | Middle East |
South Asia | UK | Business | Entertainment | Science/Nature |
Technology | Health | Talking Point | Country Profiles | In Depth |
Programmes