BBC NEWS Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific Arabic Spanish Russian Chinese Welsh
BBCi CATEGORIES   TV   RADIO   COMMUNICATE   WHERE I LIVE   INDEX    SEARCH 

BBC NEWS
 You are in:  World: Americas
Front Page 
World 
Africa 
Americas 
Asia-Pacific 
Europe 
Middle East 
South Asia 
-------------
From Our Own Correspondent 
-------------
Letter From America 
UK 
UK Politics 
Business 
Sci/Tech 
Health 
Education 
Entertainment 
Talking Point 
In Depth 
AudioVideo 


Commonwealth Games 2002

BBC Sport

BBC Weather

SERVICES 
Monday, 11 March, 2002, 01:04 GMT
You're being watched, New York!
Anti-surveillance activist Bill Brown
Bill Brown's tours point out surveillance cameras
test hello test
By Kevin Anderson
BBC News Online's correspondent in New York City
line

Walking tours are one of the best ways to discover New York City, and one unique walking tour attempts to discover some of the hundreds of surveillance cameras monitoring the Big Apple.

Anti-surveillance activist Bill Brown leads the tours in an attempt to raise awareness of the prevalence and purpose of the cameras.

The tour highlights a debate over security versus privacy and civil liberties that has gained increased currency since the 11 September attacks.

Security versus civil liberties

If you ever have the feeling of being watched, it is most likely not simple paranoia.

In 1998, the New York Civil Liberties Union sent a team of 40 volunteers around the city to take a census of surveillance cameras.

Bill Brown
Mr Brown reads the US Constitution for the benefit of those manning the cameras
They found almost 3,000 cameras, and Mr Brown estimates that several thousand more cameras have been installed since then.

And he believes that some Americans might feel the increased surveillance might be necessary to prevent additional terrorist attacks.

"We're being asked to give up civil liberties for security," Mr Brown said, but he sees it as a false choice and quoted founding father Benjamin Franklin.

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

And he questions the efficacy of cameras, noting that a number of security cameras were installed at the World Trade Centre following the 1993 bombing.

Man stands below a surveillance camera
Ever have the feeling you're being watched?
"There were so many cameras at the World Trade Centre site that I couldn't count them, and they didn't do any good," he said.

He believes that the cameras violate the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution which guarantees citizens be protected from unreasonable searches and seizures.

To make his point, he read the Fourth Amendment below one of the security cameras, saying that those manning the camera would be able to read the text of the amendment over his shoulder.

Stretching thin resources

Since the September 11 attacks, law enforcement officials are considering increasing their use of surveillance cameras.

Law enforcement agencies, especially police departments in New York and Washington, find themselves having to add increased anti-terrorism duties to other law enforcement duties.

Police say cameras allow them to monitor more areas with fewer personnel, dispatching patrols to areas where they observe suspicious activity.

Surveillance cameras
Police are using more cameras as they find their resources stretched with anti-terrorism activities
During terrorist alerts, police in Washington now operate a $7m central surveillance facility that takes feeds from 20 cameras in and around key areas such as the Capitol, the White House and several important monuments.

Police in Washington have invited the American Civil Liberties Union, a civil liberties organisation, to review the system and help craft policies for its use which respect privacy and constitutional rights, says Washington Police Chief Charles Ramsey.

Watching the watchers

Mr Brown says that the New York Police Department has not been as open about their use of cameras since the 11 September attacks.

And authorities are sensitive to revealing the security they provide. Mr Brown cautioned those on the tour about taking pictures near the United Nations, saying that it was against federal law.

"They can shoot us, but we can't shoot them," he said.

And indeed, a government security officer ordered the film crew to stop.

Later, the tour paused across the street a gated entrance near the United Nations. A camera had been panning the area in front of the gate.

"It's not moving anymore," a woman on the tour noted. The camera was trained on the group, and it did not start moving until the group began moving again.

Mr Brown believes that if the archetypical New Yorker were aware of all the cameras their response would be: "You looking at me? Hey, are you looking at me?"

Indeed, one New Yorker on the tour was concerned about the increased use of cameras. She said her privacy was very important to her.

But when it comes to balancing privacy and security, she said, "I can see both sides of the debate."

See also:

28 Feb 02 | Americas
Washington is watching
07 Feb 02 | Sci/Tech
Watching your every move
08 Nov 01 | England
CCTV cameras go domestic
Links to more Americas stories are at the foot of the page.


E-mail this story to a friend

Links to more Americas stories