| You are in: World: Americas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Friday, 15 December, 2000, 14:25 GMT
News Online readers sceptical on Bush
![]() Within hours of the final result of the US election, hundreds of e-mails poured into BBC News Online with readers' verdicts on the outcome.
While some voiced confidence in the new president-elect, the most common reaction was alarm at the prospect of a George W Bush presidency.
"This man isn't just dim, he's dangerous," wrote M Bailey from Brussels. "The man is bereft of political experience or wisdom, and with a passion for legislated murder that surely terrifies anyone with a shred of a conscience," Jim Smith wrote from London. "We can only echo Mr Gore: God Save America," wrote Sally McDonald from the US. E-mails came in from every continent, concerned about the possible prospect of a more isolationist US foreign policy. Many focused on his reported ignorance of world affairs and world leaders.
Others recalled his public speaking blunders, astonished that someone so prone to making gaffes would now be the most powerful man in the world. "The sheer lack of articulation and understanding of world issues is astounding," wrote Steve Lovell from Leeds in the UK . "On a simpler note," he added, "why should we trust anyone who comes from a family where they name their progeny after themselves? " Giving Bush a chance
"My confidence in the USA's best friend, the UK, has been shaken by all these comments," he wrote. "I'd like to point out that we elect our president to run our country, not the world." And others were willing to give Mr Bush a chance. "Let's wait and see. I hope that he will be less pro-Israel than Gore or Clinton and will be more pragmatic when dealing with the Middle East peace process," wrote Mohamed Benomar from Morocco. However, many took cheer from his ability to delegate. "The people Bush has surrounded himself with are remarkably capable. His practice of delegating authority will be well served," said John Hare in Texas. Model of democracy? Many were shocked not so much by the result, as the way in which it was reached, pointing to the fact that Mr Bush lost the popular vote. Matthew Salter from London said: "America will no longer be able to lecture the rest of the world about the sacredness of democracy." And Rita Kitto from Geneva wrote in with a sarcastic suggestion that she said could save Americans millions in tax-payers money. "Next time, instead of running a presidential election campaign, why not just give the names of the two candidates to the Supreme Court and ask them to choose?"
If you would like the chance to add your comments to our Talking Point debate, fill in the form at the bottom of this page. If you include your telephone number we may also call you back to take part in our radio programme on this subject on Sunday on the BBC World Service. Disclaimer: The BBC will use as many of your questions as possible but we cannot guarantee that all e-mails will be published. The BBC reserves the right to edit comments that are published. |
Top Americas stories now:
Links to more Americas stories are at the foot of the page.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Links to more Americas stories
|
|
|
^^ Back to top News Front Page | World | UK | UK Politics | Business | Sci/Tech | Health | Education | Entertainment | Talking Point | In Depth | AudioVideo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII | News Sources | Privacy |
|