| You are in: World: Americas | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]()
|
Tuesday, 21 November, 2000, 08:16 GMT
US awaits key Florida judgement
![]() Chief Justice Charles Wells: A matter of utmost importance
The crucial decision over whether or not Florida should allow hand recounts of votes in the US presidential election hangs in the balance as the state Supreme Court considers evidence from Democrat and Republican lawyers.
The seven black-robed justices heard two-and-a half hours of evidence on Monday, as both sides tried to convince them of their case, which could decide the outcome of the entire election.
Some polling experts believe that even if the court allows the recounts to stand, Mr Gore is not picking up enough votes to overtake Mr Bush's slim lead.
Click here to see a US electoral timetable
Both sides brought their sharpest legal minds to the Tallahassee court to face a succession of tough questions from the five men and two women judges.
Lawyers for the Democrats argued that Florida's Republican Secretary of State Katherine Harris had overstepped her authority by declaring she would accept no hand-counted results after last Tuesday. Republican lawyers responded that a court ruling allowing manual recounts could result in a "never-ending" process that could deprive Florida of its say in who will be the next US president. Tough questions Some observers interpreted the judges' aggressive questioning of Mr Bush's lawyers as a positive sign for Mr Gore, but our correspondent in Tallahassee, Paul Reynolds, says courts sometimes play the devil's advocate during oral arguments. The justices seem to be concerned with two main issues:
One judge asked a Republican lawyer if manual recounts were allowed in Texas, where Mr Bush is governor. They are, under a law signed by Mr Bush himself three years ago.
'Dimpled ballots' In Florida's biggest county, Miami Dade, a manual recount has started, although it is not expected to be complete until 1 December.
Dimpled ballots show an impression next to the name of a presidential candidate, but no clear hole. The Democrats are arguing that these ballots should be counted because they give evidence of what a voter intended. Six of the seven justices were appointed by Democrats; the seventh was a joint Republican-Democrat appointee. Mr Bush currently has a 930-vote lead out of a total of six million cast in Florida. Correspondents say Mr Bush will be encouraged by the results so far in of the recounts which indicate that he is still likely to win Florida, even if the Supreme Court allows the recounts to be taken into consideration. Votes counted so far suggest Mr Gore has picked up some 133 extra votes, and would have to pick up votes at a faster rate to overhaul Mr Bush.
Legal options Neither the Gore nor Bush campaigns are willing to say what they would do if the court's judgment goes against them, but both sides do still have options. In Florida itself, the losing side could decide to contest the official outcome of the election, whenever that might come. The losing campaign could also attempt to take its case to the federal Supreme Court in Washington. At stake are Florida's 25 electoral college votes which will give either candidate the 270 needed to win the race for the White House. Nationally, the result was so close that neither man can win without Florida.
|
See also:
Internet links:
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites Top Americas stories now:
Links to more Americas stories are at the foot of the page.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Links to more Americas stories
|
|
|
^^ Back to top News Front Page | World | UK | UK Politics | Business | Sci/Tech | Health | Education | Entertainment | Talking Point | In Depth | AudioVideo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII | News Sources | Privacy |
|