Bushmen are no longer hunter-gatherers
The Kalahari bushmen are a people living in a place, and perhaps a time, that is no longer their own.
Chief Maiteela Segwaba seems a forlorn figure, sitting in his kraal chatting to his friends - as old and as wrinkled as he.
The proud man who once hunted antelope in Botswana's central Kalahari, and gathered food, medicine and water from its plants is now chief of a small but sprawling resettlement camp outside the reserve.
"We get food and water from the government every month, so it is good here, but the ancestral land is so much better," he said.
"When we are sick we could pray by the ancestors' graves. Most people are not happy here - they would go back if the supply of water was returned by the government."
Chief Segwaba was one of the first to be resettled, but many more have followed.
There are empty cartons of cheap local beer lying all around - there may be water and basic services, but there are no jobs and there is little to do.
Thousands of bushmen used to live traditional hunter-gatherer lives inside the Central Kalahari Game Reserve, but now there are just a handful.
And few wear their loincloths or use bows and arrows to hunt game.
The water holes the government provided years ago changed them gradually into farmers - ironically their refusal to continue supplying that water is now driving the bushmen from their land.
Roy Sesana has been a thorn in the government's side
"They can stay if they want to, but we cannot afford to supply them with services," said Sydney Tshepiso Pilane, an adviser to the president and the man leading the government's court battle with the bushmen.
"Every government in every country formulates a policy for the development of all its people.
"They are not artefacts, they are not animals, they are not a tourist attraction, they are people like you and me. They do not belong where animals do, they belong in settlements, villages, towns and cities like you and me."
Only one family remains in Kukama - once a bushman village inside the reserve.
The women in their brightly coloured clothes and hats shout above each other, stamping their feet and gesticulating at their huts and their animals.
In broken English and over the cries of the baby strapped to her back, one woman explains they are angry, they do not want to live anywhere else.
A small, elderly woman surges forward. "I want to die in my village," she says.
The long line of white four-wheel-drive vehicles swept into the village and drew to a halt.
The three judges, lawyers, barristers, court officials and journalists jumped from their cars to peer around the village.
It was another stop on the court's safari through the central Kalahari, visiting resettlement camps and original villages where the bushmen live or lived.
The inspection is a preview to the court case which will pit tradition and culture against modernisation and development and decide the future of the country's original inhabitants.
It will sit in the bush at New Xade, the biggest resettlement area, and will decide if the bushmen were illegally evicted from their ancestral land.
Roy Sesana, one of the bushmen who brought the case against the government, took me around Kukama, showing me where the water tank used to stand and where the homesteads had been burned down.
"The government told us to leave or they would send the army in," he said.
"My wife was ill and I was away in the capital arguing about these removals and they told her to leave or else they would put her in my hut and burn it down."
He is bitter about the resettlement and has been a thorn in the government's side.
"The essence is the right of the people to continue to reside on their ancestral land in the Central Kalahari Game Reserve," explained Glyn Williams, the bushmen's lawyer.
"We believe that right is enshrined within the constitution and forcibly removing the residents from their land by unlawfully terminating services is to deprive them of that right."
Judges have travelled to the bush to examine the case
The government says it wants them in one place so water and social services can be provided more cheaply.
There have been rumblings that diamond rights in the reserve are at the heart of this, but this seems unlikely - it has more of the trappings of paternalism, racism and stubbornness when faced with international pressure.
The court case will have serious consequences for both the bushmen and the government - either denying them the rights to their land, or opening up the floodgates for other land claims.
But whichever way it goes the traditional hunter-gatherer lifestyle of the bushmen
is already gone, and no court case will ever bring it back.