BBC Homepage World Service Education
BBC Homepagelow graphics version | feedback | help
BBC News Online
 You are in: World
Front Page 
Middle East 
South Asia 
From Our Own Correspondent 
Letter From America 
UK Politics 
Talking Point 
In Depth 
Friday, 9 June, 2000, 15:43 GMT 16:43 UK
Trial translation inquiry ordered
Lockerbie accused
The two accused complained about translations
Judges in the Lockerbie trial have ordered an urgent inquiry into translation facilities after complaints from the two Libyan accused.

Defence lawyers said that poor translation meant the two defendants did not fully understand the proceedings at the Scottish Court in the Netherlands.

After retiring to consider a motion, the presiding judge, Lord Sutherland, said the two suspects would be given verbatim Arabic transcripts of the proceedings since the trial began on 3 May.

The men's legal teams had told the court their clients said they were receiving an "interpretation" of proceedings and not an exact account.

Exterior of court
The trial began on 3 May
Although not referred to in court, the argument hinged on Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights, which states that the accused has: "The right to be informed promptly, in a language the accused understands, in detail of the charges."

Defence counsel, Richard Keen, told the court: "An accused is entitled to understand the evidence that is being provided by the Crown in a case against him.

"Interpretation has to be practical and effective. The interpretation here seems to have been far from that."

Mr Keen said the men, who are accused of causing the deaths of 270 people when a Pan Am jet exploded over the Scottish town of Lockerbie in 1988, were entitled to a verbatim translation.

However, under the translators' contract they were instead receiving an "interpretation" of witnesses' statements.

The trial
Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi, 48, and Al Amin Khalifa Fhimah, 44, plead not guilty
They are charged with murdering 270 people
They face alternative charges of conspiracy to murder and a breach of the 1982 Aviation Security Act
They have lodged special defences of incrimination blaming, among others, members of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine - General Command
About 1,000 witnesses are expected to give evidence
The trial could last for a year
Mr Al-Megrahi's counsel, William Taylor, cited a 1942 case in Scottish law in which an appeal court over-ruled convictions of three Polish soldiers on the grounds of inadequate translation.

If the issue cannot be resolved by the court in the Netherlands, it could be referred under the European Convention for Human Rights to the High Court in Edinburgh, and then to the judicial committee of Britain's Privy Council, Mr Bonnington said.

On Thursday, the court heard evidence from two members of the United States Central Intelligence Agency.

The men, their identities disguised, described how they had found electronic timers similar to that allegedly used in the Lockerbie bombing on two men detained in Senegal 10 months before the Lockerbie bombing.

According to the indictment, the defendants ordered 60 of the timers in 1985 and late 1988.

However, the defence has suggested that US authorities attempted to frame the defendants.

Search BBC News Online

Advanced search options
Launch console
See also:

31 May 00 | World
Case 'not on container floor'
Internet links:

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

Links to more World stories are at the foot of the page.

E-mail this story to a friend

Links to more World stories