| You are in: World: Europe | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]()
|
Friday, 9 June, 2000, 14:04 GMT 15:04 UK
Rift over Star Wars
![]() Mr Putin wants a new treaty to prevent an arms race in space
Talks in Brussels have failed to resolve deep differences between the United States and Russia over their respective plans for missile defence.
US Defence Secretary William Cohen described Moscow's recent proposals to build an anti-missile system jointly with Nato countries as totally inadequate. He was speaking after the Russian Defence Minister, Igor Sergeyev, had briefed Nato counterparts on his country's proposed system, without providing much detail to flesh out the plan.
The Russian proposal comes as the US is deciding whether to deploy a limited anti-missile defence shield aimed at shooting down long-range missiles launched by what Washington calls "rogue states", such as North Korea, Iran and Iraq.
"It's basically a statement about an idea," he said after bilateral talks with Mr Sergeyev. "It's not a system." Mr Cohen said it would leave much of Europe and the US defenceless against long-range missiles. And he indicated to reporters that Washington and Moscow still seemed to be talking at cross purposes. Nato questions
Mr Sergeyev had emerged from the Nato meeting insisting that Russia's ideas were serious and that they would not destabilise the Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) treaty.
Mr Sergeyev's description of what Moscow has in mind, however, did not appear to go far enough to permit a quick assessment by the allies. Nato Secretary-General George Robertson said Mr Sergeyev had "mentioned" the proposal, but he stressed that further clarification was needed. "We're not in a position to evaluate the points made this morning," he told a news conference. "Questions have been asked and clearly they will be dealt with at a later stage." The Americans have already begun testing some of the critical technologies needed for their system. The planned shield would depend upon interceptor missiles located in the US which would target an incoming missile in space during the middle phase of its trajectory. Russian plan
The Russians fear this might compromise aspects of their own deterrent force, and they - and even some of the Nato allies - have opposed the US plan.
BBC defence correspondent Jonathan Marcus says the Russians appear to envisage a more localised theatre missile defence system that would be able to hit missiles with a potential range of some 3,500 km (2,200 miles). It would be located near to countries deemed to be a threat, and would target attacking missiles during the initial, or boost phase, of their flight. This, the Russians seem to believe, would be more in tune with the spirit of the ABM treaty. But senior American officials have told the BBC that the Russian plan would face significant technical hurdles - and would still require changes to the ABM treaty. The Americans - who want a system in place by 2005 - say their plans are driven by the emerging threat from what they call rogue states. Our correspondent says there is also a good deal of US domestic politics in Washington's proposals, especially in an election year. Mr Sergeyev's visit to Nato headquarters - the first by a Russian defence minister since December 1998 - was meant to mark a mending in military ties, ruptured by the Nato air war against Yugoslavia and the US bombings of Iraq. The defence ministers agreed on a programme for co-operation and contacts between their militaries this year.
|
See also:
Internet links:
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites Top Europe stories now:
Links to more Europe stories are at the foot of the page.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Links to more Europe stories
|
|
|
^^ Back to top News Front Page | World | UK | UK Politics | Business | Sci/Tech | Health | Education | Entertainment | Talking Point | In Depth | AudioVideo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII | News Sources | Privacy |
|