Front Page

UK

World

Business

Sci/Tech

Sport

Despatches

World Summary


On Air

Cantonese

Talking Point

Feedback

Low Graphics

Help

Site Map

Thursday, January 22, 1998 Published at 11:01 GMT



Talking Point

List that incriminates Oxford students

English students at Oxford University are guilty of poor standards in spelling, says one of the institution's former lecturers.

Bernard Richards, a former English lecturer at Brasenose College, has circulated a 142-word list of common spelling errors made by students in their university exams in 1995.

Richards described the mistakes as "alarming" and said: "Some of the solecisms on the list give cause for concern, since they indicate that the candidates have not really thought about the relationships in families of words, and the structure of specific words, with their prefixes and suffixes."

Below is a selection of the howlers to be found on Richards's list. (The correct spelling of the word is written on the right in bold.)

  • abolishion - abolition
  • angery - angry
  • boundries - boundaries
  • coincedence - coincidence
  • definately/defineately - definitely
  • desparation - desperation
  • develope - develop
  • dispair - despair
  • fued - feud
  • greatfully - gratefully
  • grusome - gruesome
  • imoral - immoral
  • knats - gnats
  • lable - label
  • melodrammatic - melodramatic
  • obselete - obsolete
  • ocurs - occurs
  • padel - paddle
  • preditor - predator
  • rediculous - ridiculous
  • rejuvkinating - rejuvenating
  • seperate - separate
  • skepticle - sceptical
  • solomn - solemn
  • tendancy - tendency
  • temprament - temperament
  • twighlight - twilight
  • wether - whether





Back to top | BBC News Home | BBC Homepage

©

  Live Talking Points

Is Bill Clinton fit to be President of the USA?

Do we still need to learn maths?

Does spelling matter?

 
  Previous Talking Points

Are governments doing enough to combat the 'millennium bug'?

Do we care too much about animals?

Will the Internet help children to learn?

Analysis: What you predicted for 1998

Analysis: Free speech key to encryption debate