![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Friday, January 16, 1998 Published at 17:48 GMT Talking Point Is the welfare system a dead end? Your reaction <% ballot="47673" ' Check nothing is broken broken = 0 if ballot = "" then broken = 1 end if set vt = Server.Createobject("mps.Vote") openresult = vt.Open("Vote", "sa", "") ' Created object? if IsObject(vt) = TRUE then ' Opened db? if openresult = True AND broken = 0 then ballotresult = vt.SetBallotName(ballot) ' read the vote votetotal=(vt.GetVoteCount(ballot, "yes")+vt.GetVoteCount(ballot, "no")) if votetotal <> 0 then ' there are votes in the database numberyes = vt.GetVoteCount(ballot, "yes") numberno = vt.GetVoteCount(ballot, "no") percentyes = Int((numberyes/votetotal)*100) percentno = 100 - percentyes ' fix graph so funny graph heights dont appear 'if percentyes = 0 then ' percentyes = 1 'end if 'if percentno = 0 then ' percentno = 1 'end if else ' summut went wrong frig it numberyes = 0 numberno = 0 percentyes = 50 percentno = 50 end if end if end if %> Votes so far:
Are there no prisons? Are there no workhouses? How easy for our society,
one of the wealthiest in the world, to dodge its responsibilities by
encouraging
us all to regard the less fortunate as 'them' rather than as part of 'us'.
Welfare may be 'a dead end' - but sadly it's a necessity for many
individuals who've received the typically apalling educational
and life opportunities that are the lot of most working class Brits.
The Japanese use a better system where you are given 70% of your last salary for 3 months only. This forces people to look for a job a lot quicker.
When you go to the unemployment office all they want to do is push you into a job - any job. It doesn't matter if you'll hate it, and it doesn't matter if you're no good at it. Getting benefit payments can keep your head above water, but you need more than that to survive long term. All in all the welfare system should be a lifeline, but so often, rather than being a dead end, it directs you into an unhappy maze of unsatisfactory jobs.
Yes, it is long overdue that the welfare system was overhauled. It has led to
the kind of attitudes such as that of Jenny Hamblin (above). She's content to
milk the system rather than work for a living, even for a pittance. Welfare
is, no doubt, responsible for the decline in personal and family
responsibility in Britain. It has created an underclass of workshy
unemployables.
The welfare system is a deadend for some, probably many, but a lifeline for
others. It was meant as a safety net for those who could not help themselves.
There is often not a connection in the minds of those receiving benefit
between
the payments and who is providing them - the taxpayer. Very often the beneficiaries seem to assume the money comes "from the government". The whole
system does need reform - but not dismantlement.
The welfare system should not be a dead end. However, after years of abuse of
the benefits and NHS system they are bankrupt. Reform is essential and the
systems need to continue to exist. The public must be made aware of the level
of abuse, and accept change or be prepared to scrap the benefits and NHS
systems altogether - it seems that, given some of the criticisms, this would
be
the prefered choice: status quo leading to abolition!?
Just because there is fraud doesn't mean we do away with a system that tries
to
help those in need.
It is like saying "throw out all the politicians from the House of Commons,
just because a few are unscrupulous".
However, what also needs to be done is to inform the public that welfare is
not
a "right". Its aim must be to get those in need back on their feet. There
needs to be a time limit and a gradual decrease in benefit payment over that
time limit as an inducement to seek work. In those cases where disability is
total, a "civilised" society should take of these citizens.
At the same time, when fraud is encountered, it must dealt with severely.
Punishemnt must be swift and "painful" and should be "publised". Word needs to
get out that fraud will not be tolerated.
The welfare state has been a fundamental part of our country for 50 years. It
has provided both a safety net and support for those who are out of work, too
ill to work or require assistance. Such a noble goal as to help people in need
is not a dead end. However the Welfare System is in dire need of change and
modernisation. There are many problems which need to be dealt with, while
remembering the aim of this noble services. Hopefully Tony Blair will be able
to do this.
Should society really
support able-bodied people who simply choose not to work, or give those with
minor disabilities the same level of support as those with serious problems?
I
think not. Welfare should always be given to those who genuinely need it but
it should not be an alternative to work for those who are not in genuine
need.
Workshy scivers will only ever find a dead end. It's all up to the individual. If you're a sciver who doesn't really want help then of course the benefits system is a dead end - and that's probably all you want. But, if you are self motivated, then the benefits system is the only way back onto the ladder of society. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||