Front Page

UK

World

Business

Sci/Tech

Sport

Despatches

World Summary


On Air

Cantonese

Talking Point

Feedback

Low Graphics

Help

Site Map

Monday, February 2, 1998 Published at 18:07 GMT



World: Analysis



PUBLISHED AT 18:07 GMT Monday, February 2, 1998 : ROGER HARDY
image: [ BBC analyst Roger Hardy ]Roger Hardy
From

In a fresh confrontation with the United Nations, Iraq has again prevented a UN weapons inspection team from doing its work. Iraqi officials have complained that there are too many Americans on the team, but President Clinton has warned the Iraqis they can't pick and choose who the weapons inspectors should be. To look at why the Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein has launched this latest challenge, here's our Middle East analyst, Roger Hardy.

Many observers saw the outcome of last November's stand-off between Iraq and the UN as unsatisfactory, fearing further defiance from Saddam Hussein. Then as now, the issue was the composition of the UN weapons inspection teams. Following Iraq's expulsion of the American inspectors, there was a big build-up of US military forces in the Gulf. But the crisis was eventually defused with Russian help.

Saddam seems to have concluded that the US and its allies had little appetite for the use of force. He also saw he could exploit the divisions within the UN Security Council and the sympathy Iraq enjoys in the Third World, where many feel Iraq has been punished enough for its invasion of Kuwait in 1990. It was that action which led the UN to impose tough sanctions which have crippled the Iraqi economy. Only when the UN certifies that Iraq has destroyed its weapons of mass destruction, and no longer has the means to make them in the future, will it be allowed to resume the oil exports on which its economy depends.

As in the past, it's not clear how far Saddam Hussein is prepared to go on this occasion. The UN Secretary-General, Kofi Annan, did urge the Iraqi leadership not to take any precipitate action, but to wait for the head of the weapons inspection programme -- the plain-speaking Australian, Richard Butler -- who has now arrived back in Baghdad. But the Iraqis did not heed this advice. To judge from his past behaviour, Saddam will push the crisis as far as he can, in order to test the resolve of the Security Council -- and to see how much he can get.

The underlying problem is that the United States, backed by Britain, has so far proved unwilling to envisage an eventual exit from sanctions, even though it's clear they can't go on for ever. The Americans fear that, once released from the shackles of sanctions, Saddam would revert to his old behaviour of bullying his neighbours and causing problems for the West. Hence their policy which is, in effect, that there will be no lifting of sanctions as long as Saddam is in power. Several other countries -- including France, Russia and a number of Arab states -- argue this gives the Iraqi regime no incentive to co-operate. They favour a gradual, and conditional, lifting of sanctions. As long as this dilemma is not resolved, further confrontations between Iraq and the UN seem inevitable.





Back to top | BBC News Home | BBC Homepage

©