![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tuesday, January 20, 1998 Published at 17:33 GMT Talking Point Will the Internet help children to learn? Your reaction <% ballot="" ' Check nothing is broken broken = 0 if ballot = "" then broken = 1 end if set vt = Server.Createobject("mps.Vote") openresult = vt.Open("Vote", "sa", "") ' Created object? if IsObject(vt) = TRUE then ' Opened db? if openresult = True AND broken = 0 then ballotresult = vt.SetBallotName(ballot) ' read the vote votetotal=(vt.GetVoteCount(ballot, "yes")+vt.GetVoteCount(ballot, "no")) if votetotal <> 0 then ' there are votes in the database numberyes = vt.GetVoteCount(ballot, "yes") numberno = vt.GetVoteCount(ballot, "no") percentyes = Int((numberyes/votetotal)*100) percentno = 100 - percentyes ' fix graph so funny graph heights dont appear 'if percentyes = 0 then ' percentyes = 1 'end if 'if percentno = 0 then ' percentno = 1 'end if else ' summut went wrong frig it numberyes = 0 numberno = 0 percentyes = 50 percentno = 50 end if end if end if %> Votes so far:
I feel the internet is a wonderful opportunity for children to learn new
ideas, concepts, and information. The internet will help me as a teacher convey new information to my students.
I only wish that the Internet and CD-Roms were around when I was at school.
As long as they complement traditional teaching methods, and don't replace
them, they can only enhance a child's development.
However, the child must be taught how to distinguish between authentic
information and empty propaganda. There are enough gullible Netheads out there
already.
There is a new generation of students who are not receptive to old teaching
methods. With the right direction, the internet could be a beneficial tool to
reach these students.
The internet is a passive medium; children should learn in an active, creative
manner. The focus of computer aided education should be abstract problem
solving with languages such as Logo.
I feel the internet is a wonderful opportunity for children to learn new
ideas,
concepts, and information.
The internet will help me as a teacher convey new information to my students.
It would be useful if it was used under proper supervision. The access is so
wide that children would be able to access useful as well as damaging
information to their development and growth. it should be used, but not too
excessively.
The Internet is a huge resource and as such should not be ignored. It's very
cheap and easy for schools who already have fast NC-compatible computer
hardware to connect to the Internet, costing as little as a thousand pounds a
year. Our children deserve the opportunity to develop skills that are sure to
be necessary later in life, as the Internet becomes more of a part of everyday
life. There is simply no substitute for the experience they can gain through
the Internet. There is software to keep them safe, there is content they can look at, there's no financial reason not to, so why don't we do it?
Will the Internet help children to learn? The answer would have to be a
qualified "yes" - provided that sufficient support is given to the teaching
profession, so that teachers are equipped to use it as another resource.
It will doubtless be pointed out - with some justification - that there is a
great deal of incorrect and misleading information on the world-wide web.
However, surely one of the objectives in education is to teach pupils to
discriminate between good and bad sources.
But it must not become the current craze at the expense of
other tried and tested resources, but regarded as just one more tool for
learning.
I assume that we intend not to let our 6 year olds loose on the 'Internet'
but rather a controlled stylised version. Building a resourse that can be used
by schools from all corners of the UK and the World.
There is far too much meaningless information available that even experienced net users fail often to find anything of use. Give our children their own Kids Internet. Link it to sites outside where appropriate but don't let our children waste their valuable time as we do in looking through the 100s of pages that are returned every time we carry out a search.
Give every child 26 volumes of an encyclopaedia or give every school an Internet connection?
The Internet will, of course, help children to learn - they will, at least,
learn how to use an Internet browser and search for particular web sites.
This is useful stuff considering that is where the future is going. However,
I can't see any benefit over classroom teaching and good encyclopedias.
The cost alone should prevent most schools, although IT always seems to
be able to attract more money than other areas of school budgets, including
essentials, such a books.
The lesson the Net teaches is a sophisticated one that most don't encounter
until they get to college/university: that NO source is perfectly
reliable and trustworthy, that wisdom can be gleaned from the oddest places, and that, by definition, the reader is forced to be the ultimate arbitrator whether he/she wants to be or not.
The Internet will definitely help children provided controls are put in place
to check what they have access to. The Internet can not and should not replace teachers, books and field trips.
We are trying to rebuild this country to take its place in Europe, how can we
possibly do this without a highly skilled, flexible work force? We can only
create this with educated flexible children. Perhaps if educated with the
Iternet as another tool, our children will forge a new cyber empire. If not, why else should I remain a committed IT teacher?
Although I acknowledge the potential for killing mindless hours, and the
acknowledge the responsibility for guidance, as a parent with a child, I can immediately contact places such as the historic site of Henry VIII's ship, the Mary Rose or converse by email with individuals who found he Anglo-Saxon helmet last year. We have written questions to the orbiting astronauts and rally drivers in the Australian Outback.
I have been teaching pupils to use the Internet for two years. we have 200
computers in our school, all with Internet access. If used correctly, it is a
wonderful tool for learning and is used with tremendous enthusiasm by staff
and pupils alike. Of course there are pitfalls and we are learning to overcome
them, but the ability to communicate with and to take in information from,
outside sources, hitherto uncontactable, is a boost to the education of out
pupils.
Spending millions on computer hardware and then not
investing in teacher computer fluency is a bit like buying a new car when you
don't have a driver in the family.
I have 2 children, aged 2 and 4 and a half. We are certainly introducing them to computers but will not expose them to the realm of the Internet for many years to come! If there were a Child's Only Internet it would be another thing.
I believe that although the internet does not allow children to truly experience these things first hand, it does allow them to experience more than they ever could by trying to travel around the world which is more than far from reality for most of us.
The Internet certainly helps children learn. Contrary to those who insist that
reflection on a certain topic is lost with the Internet, where else can children access all the art museums of the world at the click of a button? If they think that trips abroad are the only way for children to learn, then learning is restricted to a select few.
I highly value the imperativeness of reading books and I am concerned that, just like television, the Internet will become an alternative. Regardless, we are in a highly technologically advanced society and must allow our children the access that will allow them to move forward in a technical society.
It can only work if the technology is correctly applied and this is only
possible if the educators define their requirements from the outset. CD ROMS
are more structured, cheaper in large numbers, and devoid of illicit material.
I think that the use of the Internet is an unecessary step in our already
overtechnical way of teaching children how to live in this society that we
have created. If we would keep education simple without all of this technology then maybe the children of our mind-polluted world would begin to take us back to an exciting social environment.
I personally have opened my eyes and learned many new ideas due
to the Internet. This is one beneficial learning tool that should not be
looked over.
I personally wish I would have been able to enjoy the Internet at a much younger age. I might have been more enthusiastic about learning.
The Internet is here to stay and rather than asking will kids learn from it,
we should ensure that those that are working in the industry should place
learning materials on the web and keep them updated. Kids are going to use the web so let's use it as a tool for them.
I have absolutely no confidence in the Internet as an educational tool. It
discourages focus, synthesis and calm reflection. It is thereby destructive of
learning and scholarship. Information accessed through the Internet is simply
too vast and indiscriminate, severed from context and meaning.
Of course the Internet will help children to learn. The wealth of information
available makes it the world's biggest encyclopedia.
Parents role at home is also very important to guide and stimulate the interest of the kids, while at the same time protecting them from harmful sites or wrong information.
The Internet cannot substitute formal school education but can certainly
complement it.
One very important part of the NetYear initiative is that it will change the
way our children perceive the world, and thus the opportunities that world
presents. Growing up with the Internet as an important part of their lives
will enable them to adapt to the culture of a world in transition, providing
them with a significant competitive advantage over those that are not
'wired'.
The Internet is increasingly becoming an invaluable effective learning
resource, not only on its own merits but also in making us aware of other
sources of information which old methods of learning simply couldn't achieve as effectively. It should be encouraged.
What children need is to develop
concentration and not whole lot of
information stuffed in.
They should be made to enjoy learning
first and latter be introduced to
higher method of learning.
Till they are 12 yrs of age they
should be developed in old method
of mental calculations etc.
I'm 17 now, and I wish that I'd got the Internet earlier. I don't think it's
too hard for little kids to use, actually I think it's very easy; and I am 100% self taught. The Internet is an ideal way of teaching children how to use computers, a far better way than hours of school time spent playing
computer games! People are never too young to learn. Computers are these
childrens' futures, they should be using them as soon as possible.
The ability to read fluently and with understanding is worth a million
Internet experiences.
It should not be seen as the answer to all problems or as the only investment necessary to improve the performance of our schools but used in the right way, with appropriate training for both students
and staff, it will be invaluable.
No. Teachers should be teaching our 5-11 year olds to read, write and do basic
math, not drool over a computer screen - you can get paid to do that when your
older and properly educated. That money should go to deserving teachers (those
that get results), not BT or ICL, they've got more than enough.
The internet should be treated as per any other media - a learning resource,
which needs to be implemented in a manner that ensure children benefit from
the advantages that it offers. A shoddy implementation could wreck the whole ethos of internet in schools.
I am one of the founders of UK NetYear and strongly believe that the Internet
can provide both a valuable learning resource and will be a vital skill
required of school leavers of the next century.
The Internet can be very useful in helping all people young and old learn
more.
As a future educator I will try anything that will help my
students understand concepts better.
Without guidance it could simply become another entertainment tool
like TV or VCR's. People can learn much from those resourses also but do not always take the opportunity.
The Internet is a mass of unstructured, uncontrolled information. It is akin
to a huge interactive dictionary. I would not like my child to be asked to use a dictionary before he could effectively read, write and do arithmetic. At ages 6-10, children need only to be aware of the Internet and how to use it. But later, it will be virtually impossible to stop children from surfing for
unsuitable content.
My eight-year-old son has already used the internet to research projects on
Uranus (taking advantage of direct links to NASA) and on Thomas Jefferson
(using links to Monticello and the Internet Public Library). It's not a
novelty
to children of his age. It's just another source of information. I wouldn't
deny him access to the internet any more than I would deny him his library
card
(but I will make sure that no mindless Nintendo or Sega games ever enter our
home; those are the real dangers).
Although the internet is the best media for education and knowledge but it must be monitored, otherwise it is very harmful. Students who use the internet for education, could look at some other pages.
I'm a student at Cambridge, and even now at the age of 18, and with
considerable Internet experience, I find it difficult to locate concise
relevant information. I can't see how it will help infant school children.
If you want students to enter the adult world
prepared to deal with it, you must let them participate in the community - with
the teachers helping.
Simply knowing how to use a set of applications is not
the same as having a knowledge of computing, and no help in discriminating
legitimate from bogus information, and of course, information isn't knowledge.
Frankly, I don't want to share the Internet with a millions of minors. The
internet is a breath of anarchic, deregulated fresh air, providing me with
first hand information free of corporate/governmental 'spin' and media
manipulation. I don't want the censorship and paranoia which will follow the
opening of the Internet to school children.
Ultimately nothing can replace the capabilities of human beings in terms of
interaction.
It's like asking "will books help children
to learn", or "will TV help children to
learn". Of course it *can* help, but it
will depend on what information they use
it to access. The role of teachers must be to help
children understand what is available and
how to judge its value -- more or less
the same skills as children should learn
with respect to books, magazines, TV, etc.
Answers to the "opposite" question might
be more revealing: "Would it harm childrens'
education to deny them access to the Internet?"
I think the answer to that will increasingly
be "YES!"
The Internet is awash with facts and information, both important factors in
education. But facts don't equal learning, and information doesn't equal
wisdom.
I wrote the UK School Internet Primer four years ago. People said I was crazy.
Now I know I am right - I work in a school and see the fruits of educative,
eclectic Internet use every day. Education is wider than memorizing the dogma
of your age. The Internet is great at reminding us how broad and varied a true
education should be.
Children need to learn to read and write, and how to learn. Collecting
information and new experiences should be done in a variety of ways. If
children are not given access to all the sights and sounds of the real world,
they will never appreciate the things that can be got from the Internet. I'm
sure most web-browsers had trouble getting where thay wanted to go in the
beginning, why waste school time sitting in front of a screen when there are
books and pictures and other things to be seen.
I have doubts that the net is not structured enough and that children will
spend many hours seeking after little or no information. But if they are
guided
there is a use for some activities.
Nothing and nobody can MAKE children learn.The Internet will help those
children who have an interest in wanting to learn to learn more and to learn
it more quickly.
Probably of most use is the setting up of intranets within schools - this
gives
staff control over what is available, and allows a much more directed
approach.
It is this use of the technology that has the most to offer. The Internet,
and its associated technologies, is already revolutionising the way we work,
play and do business, and it is crucial that we exploit this from an early
age,
or others will, to our disadvantage.
The Internet if used correctly is an aid to learning not a replacement for
conventional learning methods. It can benefit all sections of society but the
output is only as good as the input. More thought is needed in structuring
learning sites for children.
However, that takes away the fun in the Internet.
The global comuter network, Internet, is a primarily a communication,
networking, and publishing tool. As such it is a process in information, as
opposed to an object in the world.
The Internet should be seen as an important component in primary, as well
as secondary education. There is a lot of interesting and useful information
available from many Web sites that not only provides the facts and figures,
but also serves to stimulate interest. The National Geographic Society's
site is a good, but not exclusive example, of how this can work.
The Internet's educational potential is matched only by the hype.
Both are huge. I am a developer of web-based training
materials for academia, and I know how important it is
that people don't just expect the technology
to do the teaching for them. Very strong guidelines are needed.
There has to be a genuine purpose behind it.
In limited amounts. The Internet is merely a tool to give us access to
information and provide global communication. Slick graphics and 3D virtual worlds, however, are no replacement for the basic skills. If we begin to sacrifice basic skills for "surfing the net" - our children will be well
versed in the world wide web, but have no concept of how to apply it in their lives.
I have used the Internet for over 3 years and it has helped me with my GCSEs
and A-Levels. It will help kids.
The Internet is much too uncoordinated, slow and complicated for it to
be better than conventional programs on disk or CD ROM.
Internet is here to stay, so there is no point
in keeping children away from this wondeful media.
But, this should happen under the guidance of parents
or teachers to avoid misuse.
At that age ( 6/7 ) they are still too young to exercise much judgement and
they could be exposed to pernicious influences via Right Wing web sites with alternative explanations for the Holocaust for example. Overall I would suggest that 6 or 7 is too young and counter with the trend towards less exercise in todays young people. Perhaps more benefit would be derived from acquiring study skills.
Teacher education is the biggest missing piece. The Internet is just another
communications medium, like books, magazines, video, TV, etc.
The students need a teacher who understands the medium well enough to help them interpret the content received.
The Web is a very inefficient place to search
for information, and the probability of
distraction onto time wasting topics is
virtually certain. Children will still find a decent book on the
subject they are studying much more efficient.
As a leisure activity, the web is great.
I see no reason why the Internet should
not be used for teaching children of
all ages. There is a wealth of
information to be gained from the Internet
and provided proper instruction is given
to teachers, along with safeguards to
prevent access to less desirable sites,
children should be allowed access to
this ever growing resource.
Only if it can be guaranteed that the quality of the information is true and
fair. Learning on the net will need to be strictly focused because of its size
and impersonal nature.
I use the Internet all the time, but it's not for kids. Certainly, it should be use for recreation and communication - but not as a teaching tool. Children are so impressionable, expecially when young - and this initiative plans to target kids under 10 years. At that age they should be learning creative skills from more traditional media rather than being confused by technology, especially when a lot of the teacher's won't understand the technology either!
You are never too young to learn. Obviously, the access and content have to be controlled but I believe the Internet is potentiallya new and exciting way of getting information.
Yes but everything will have to be a lot more accessible....This 46 year old
has a lot of difficulty!
Boys are under-achieving in schools - why?
Most find their Playstations far more exciting than school.
Access to the Internet might help boys to take more interest in school work. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||