|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wednesday, January 7, 1998 Published at 14:35 GMT World: Analysis Why ballooning around the world is so hard
Richard Branson lost his balloon but will try again. Steve Fossett landed in Russia after hitting technical problems. And two other
teams in the United States and Switzerland are standing by, waiting for just
the right moment. Why is it so difficult to circumnavigate the earth by
balloon? Sarah Griffiths of BBC Science has been investigating:
Steve Fossett is the latest hot-air ballooning casualty in what has been
described as "the last great aeronautical adventure within the Earth's
atmosphere."
Unfortunately, he
was forced to land in southern Russia after a series of equipment breakdowns.
"I'm a little bit discouraged, but nevertheless it was a good flight and so I
have to be satisfied with having made a good flight across the Atlantic and
made it one third of the way around the world."
Of the six teams involved in the competition, only three now have a chance of
making the daring attempt this year, and these are larger balloons, designed to
make use of the so-called jet streams, the fast winds that blow at altitudes of
around 12 kilometres from West to East in the Northern hemisphere. And it is
because of this that the balloonists are forced to attempt the trip during the
winter months, as Britain's Richard Branson explains.
So there are two different approaches to the challenge, low-tech low altitude
flights and high-tech higher altitude attempts. Cameron Balloons of Bristol,
England are involved in both, having designed four of the competing vehicles. Jim Howard is their production director.
"The high-tech high level attempt, you have to produce a capsule which you can
live and breath in for up to 21 days; a sealed capsule which is pressurized.
The high altitude on the face of it would appear to be the best bet. The lower
altitude balloon, you are more likely to encounter different types of weather
and be blown off course and other things."
In fact having failed in his recent attempt, Steve Fossett now feels that any
successful around-the-world voyage may have to be made in a pressurized capsule
and Jim Howard agrees with this.
"If you are going to go in a pressurized balloon, it is much heavier and you
can have heating. Poor Steve [Fossett] over five days has had to endure
temperatures of minus twenty degrees celcius and it really saps your energy and your morale goes. So I probably agree with Steve that it's going to be very
difficult to do it at low level. It can be done, but it's going to be
difficult."
But there are drawbacks to using a more technical balloon, as Don Cameron of
Cameron Balloons points out. He is currently with the team in Switzerland, who
hope to launch their Breitling Orbiter this week.
"This can be an advantage and a disadvantage. It should have better
performance, being able to go higher, but with more untried experimental
equipment, there is a risk of things going wrong."
And on top of the technical problems are the dangers of severe air turbulence
and lightning strikes, and the accumulation of ice which forces balloons to
make regular excursions into lower and warmer altitudes to melt it. So in the face of all these difficulties, is it really likely that one of the teams will
succeed? Jim Howard is convinced it is only a matter of time.
"It isn't just a stupid dream. There are many unmanned balloons that have
travelled around the world and come back again. What we do know is it will be
done. Within the next three years it will definately be done and we hope it's
this year."
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||