|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Thursday, January 1, 1998 Published at 18:59 GMT UK Ambitious targets in Euro presidency ![]() The Government has a stiff task in reducing gas emissions
As the UK takes over the presidency of the European Union, BBC Environment Correspondent, Robert Pigott, examines the implications for the environment.
The Government's targets, although couched in cautious language, are
ambitious. Ministers want to establish the methods by which the eight per cent
reduction in greenhouse gas emissions agreed at Kyoto will be met.
There could be measures on
solvents, biotechnology and water.
Among the risks attached to such a
programme are that some initiatives may prove costly enough to make them
unpopular.
"We are riding a wave of interest in Europe in which people are
looking to a quality of life, a better environment as an essential part of
prosperity, and people realise that having high income and jobs and welfare is
insufficient unless they have a good environment," he said.
Even given the will to meet environmental targets, the political
process in Europe is slow. That will make it harder to make demonstrable
progress, and could mean some of the Government's targets turning into hostages
of fortune.
The Socialist Environment and Resources Association, a left-of-
centre group which researches green issues, concedes that in a democratic
organisation there are limits to the ability of the presidency to force
measures through.
But its chairman, Hugh Raven, says controlling what is
discussed will help.
"It is unlikely we can carry any initiative through to conclusion
but we can put things on the agenda and make sure that they are pushed to the
point of no return by the end of six months," he said.
The Socialist Environment and Resources Association and other
environment groups have yet to be convinced that the Government's performance
on the environment matches its aspirations in opposition.
However, ministers
apparently believe that they can tackle big issues - like cutting carbon
dioxide emissions - sufficiently well to enhance their environmental
credentials.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||