|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wednesday, December 10, 1997 Published at 09:51 GMT World Deal to cut greenhouse gases ![]() An agreement would greatly reduce harmful gas emissions
The Kyoto summit on climate change has ended with the developed world committing itself to cuts of 6% below 1990 levels.
The deal was announced by the chairman of the core team of conference negotiators, Raul Estrada.
There was no indication whether Americans had won out over the controversial question of whether governments would have the right to buy emission quotas allocated to other countries.
The United States had wanted to allow a greenhouse gas trading system to cut emissions of global pollutants, whereby rich, industrial nations could buy the right to produce more emissions from countries which have fallen short of their allocations.
European ministers said that the proposal was irresponsible and the United States was looking for loopholes.
Sharp divisions between US and European negotiators appear to have been overcome.
The EU originally wanted to impose legally binding cuts of 15% on developed countries' output of greenhouse gases, while the United States proposed an overall cut of 5% .
Europeans accused the United States of not offering enough cuts. The United States is responsible for 24% of the world's carbon dioxide.
If signed, the accord would wrap up two years of negotiations to strengthen
the Climate Change Treaty by setting legally binding limits on 34
industrial nations' emissions of such greenhouse gases as carbon
dioxide and methane.
All for nothing?
Even if the two sides do reach an agreement, the US Senate Majority Leader, Trent Lott, said on Tuesday that the treaty had only "bleak
prospects" of ratification.
"I have made clear to the president personally that the Senate
will not ratify a flawed Climate Change Treaty," Mr Lott said in a
letter to Republican Senator Chuck Hagel of Nebraska who is in Kyoto
leading a US observer group.
The Mississippi Republican reiterated his opposition to a treaty
provision that he said would "empower international bureaucrats to
impose financial obligations on the United States." He said
concerns of US business and labour are not being addressed in the
treaty negotiations.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||