The story of Mall security guard, Harry Cain, who's wife is mysteriously murdered in Wisconsin.
(Edited highlights of the panel's review taken from the teletext subtitles that are generated live for Newsnight Review.)
MARK LAWSON:
Kwame, I walked to this
through a very tense London
and pictures of Madrid on
television, and in that
sense seems very timely.
KWAME KWEI-ARMAH:
It is. But I think it is a
wonderful film and I found
it thematically and visually
beautiful. A stunning
central performance by John
Turturro, who understates
but yet moves forward, who
brings you into his world
but yet makes you wonder
whether he is good or bad or
right or wrong, it's a
beautiful film.
LAWSON:
Tom Paulin, he picks up a
lot on the CCTV footage, and
that is powerful. Jamie
Bulger, Princess Diana,
almost all major incidents
now, there is CCTV. They use
that very well I think.
TOM PAULIN:
A very powerful film
about anxiety, about guilt
somewhere in white Anglo-
Saxon Protestant America,
something to do with the law
or the people administering
the law corrupt, what's
going on? Very, very, very
powerful and then it loses
it within sight of the end.
It goes hay wire, the plot
goes hay wire, you don't
know where you are and it
ends badly. It doesn't work.
NATASHA WALTER:
I completely disagree. We
can't give away the ending
but I just thought the
ending was wonderful. This
is a film that surprises
you. I felt that I knew
somehow where the film was
going. I felt I knew the
genre it was sitting in, the
little guy and the bumbling
cops around him, who are
kind of hostile, he'd expose
their corruption. Then it
did something else and
turned itself into an inward
journey, a psychological
journey. It left you
wondering whether what you
had been watching was at
some points a dream, or
whether it had been entirely
objective.
PAULIN:
But it lets itself off the
hook because ...
WALTER:
It doesn't.
KWEI-ARMAH:
I don't think so at all.
PAULIN:
There is an awful abstract
bit towards the end.
KWEI-ARMAH:
I loved that abstract bit
because it made me think. I
think the director says he
didn't want to make a film
we could predict. He wanted
to construct something that
made us think.
PAULIN:
He make a film he couldn't
end because the plot, I have
to say, goes hay wire. You
don't finally know where you
are and there isn't, finally
it doesn't face up to
itself. It is something to
do with forgetting and
forgiveness.
WALTER:
It is not meant to be a
realist film thought, it has
got a symbolic element to
it.
PAULIN:
It has a symbolic element
and there is a symbolic
political theme but it
finally doesn't get it
together.
LAWSON:
He is trying to make a
paranoid film and there are
quite clear references to
the Conversations, because
the central character is
almost the same name.
Arlington Road I thought all
that was there. But it's a
more arty version of it. But
Hubert Selby Jr, a man in
his mid-70s, Last Exit To
Brooklyn is still read
by teenagers, amazingly, he
has still got this ability
to tap into what is going on
because it feels like a
young person's film.
WALTER:
It does. Also it felt to me
a bit like something like
Twin Peaks, but it has this
more...
KWEI-ARMAH:
A rooted centre, I felt.
WALTER:
Exactly. It has that central
character, driven by the
central performance, as you
say. That is moving, David
Lynch doesn't have that
stable psychological core in
that way.