|
By Dominic Casciani
BBC News Online at the Saville Inquiry
|
Martin McGuinness has finished two days in the
witness box at the Bloody Sunday Inquiry - and what
have we learned? For starters, that Martin McGuinness
does not take to the idea of a Martin McGuinness
Inquiry. And he will not name the names of his former IRA colleagues - even if it incurs the distinct displeasure of Lord Saville.
Throughout his 14 or so hours in the spotlight, Sinn
Fein's former education minister made it very clear he believed
the Saville Inquiry had become one purely interested
in his IRA past.
Martin McGuinness was once IRA's Derry commander
|
But given that the public interest - the inquiry set
up a second public gallery with a live video link - Mr McGuinness's appearance was inevitably going to be the biggest event of the inquiry.
Why? Because here was one of Northern Ireland's most
senior republicans partially lifting the veil on the
most secretive guerrilla army in the world.
Switched to Provos
So we learned that Mr McGuinness joined the
long-defunct Official IRA in 1970 before quickly switching for the Provisionals.
He became the Derry commander within two weeks of Bloody Sunday.
He told us how an "engineering officer" would have
built a nailbomb.
Mr McGuinness told us why, in military terms, he thought it an "awful waste" to throw it at an army vehicle, rather than a soldier.
Truth and reconciliation
Northern Ireland does not have a South African-style
truth and reconciliation commission.
Some people, including Mr McGuinness, think it might
be necessary.
But the Saville Inquiry is the best anyone has got to date.
The Sinn Fein MP said, in respect to reconciliation, he had been wary of how his evidence may influence unionist opinion.
 |
Here we go again with another trawl through the
Martin McGuinness fixation
|
So Edwin Glasgow QC, counsel for some of the soldiers,
had the very question in the interest of truth and
reconciliation: "When exactly did Martin McGuinness
stop being a member of the IRA?"
"Here we go again with another trawl through the
Martin McGuinness fixation," said the witness.
"No, sir, it is not at all," said Mr Glasgow. "May I
just explain to you, as you have been very concerned understandably to be treated in the same way as the soldiers - and it is precisely the same question word for word as was asked [of them]."
Mr McGuinness paused: "I left the IRA in the early
part of the 1970s."
Independent tribunal
Mr McGuinness's evidence cannot be summed up simply.
As expected he said the IRA did not have guns on the
streets of Derry during Bloody Sunday.
Mr McGuinness refused to answer certain questions
|
But at the end of two days of verbal jousting, he
stuck to his self-imposed "code of honour" and said he
would not name the other IRA officers in 1972 Derry.
So his appearance became much more than just what he
was doing on that cold but bright winter's day in
1972.
It became about the very nature of history and
truth in Northern Ireland: what each side is prepared
to say to the other, and what the very act of telling
- or not - means in the peace process.
For instance Mr McGuinness said Derry's Catholics
knew in their heart the truth of Bloody Sunday - the
question was whether the tribunal would recognise this
same truth.
It was his doubt that it would which had partly
delayed him giving evidence.
"Looking to your right," said Mr Glasgow, "Would you
accept that this is an international, independent and distinguished tribunal.
 |
All you had to do to fall foul of the IRA in 1972 was
to show sympathy for a soldier
|
"I accept it is distinguished but I do not accept it
is independent," said Mr McGuinness.
It was an echo of every single republican appearance
before a British court over three decades. Then he
paused, and asked for the opportunity to elaborate.
"I am casting no aspersions on any of the people
sitting on this tribunal, none at all, because I am
one of those people who travel in hope in relation to
the peace process."
So, with reservations, he had appealed to other
republicans to have confidence in the tribunal and to
give what evidence they could.
Confidence in republicans?
But what about confidence in republicans? What about
those who had evidence contrary to his world view,
asked Mr Glasgow.
There was no evidence against the IRA, said Mr
McGuinness, other than that concocted by informers,
liars, and a "fairy tale" of his life penned by Sunday
Times journalist Liam Clarke.
The inquiry is examining the events of 30 January 1972
|
"Would it be right, Mr McGuinness, to say that people
in this city would have good reason to be concerned to
ensure that they did not say anything that upset the Provisional IRA?"
"I do not see why that would be the case," he replied.
Mr Glasgow persisted with the line.
"All you had to do to fall foul of the IRA in 1972 was
to show sympathy for a soldier.
 |
I would like to think that I have, along with others,
played a role in trying to alleviate the plight of
relatives who have suffered a great injustice
|
"We saw this weekend, mercifully, the return of the
body of a lady whose only crime had been to comfort a
drying soldier and who, for that crime was taken from
her children and buried in secret."
Mr Glasgow was referring to Jean McConville, the west
Belfast mother of 10 whose body was recovered from a
secret grave after her kidnap and murder by the IRA.
"I would like to think that I have, along with others,
played a role in trying to alleviate the plight of
relatives who have suffered a great injustice," said
Mr McGuinness.