Newsnight investigated the allegations of dozens of soldiers who came forward claiming they had been bullied in the armed services. We put their claims to the Deputy Chief of the Defence Staff, General Anthony Palmer.
Warning: Text and video link contains strong language.
JEREMY PAXMAN:
I put the points raised in
the film to the man in
charge of the way the MoD
treats its staff, the Deputy
Chief of the Defence Staff
General Anthony Palmer. I
asked him if he accepted
that bullying was a problem.
GENERAL ANTHONY PALMER:
(Deputy Chief Defence Staff)
I don't accept there is a
bullying problem. I think
there is a question of
perspective here. We have
trained about 28,000 people
every year and there are
about 220,000 in the armed
forces. The vast majority of
them have very positive
experiences, both in
training and subsequently
when they get on to serve in
their units. And I think
that is being demonstrated
by operational success over
the last ten years, most
notably recently in Iraq.
However, it is undeniable
that there are cases of
bullying in the army but
they have to be seen in the
overall context of the size
of the army and the number
of bullying instances that
there are.
PAXMAN:
But they are clearly not
just isolated cases, are
they. According to your own
survey, 43% of those
questioned, a sample of
2,000 service personnel,
said bullying was a problem.
5% reported they had been
victims of it.
PALMER:
Well, we're currently
investigating about 75 cases
from last year.
PAXMAN:
But these are thousands of
cases?
PALMER:
Well, I don't believe that
there are...
PAXMAN:
Is the survey wrong?
PAXMAN:
No. What we've done is we've
put in place the procedures
that people can make
complaints about bullies and
bullying. And we very much
encourage not only them, the
people who feel bullied but
their friends and comrades
too, report these cases and
we investigate them and we
deal with them.
PAXMAN:
OK, we'll come to the
procedures in a moment. But
43% of people questioned,
your own people, your own
survey, say bullying is a
problem. That is not just
isolated instances is it?
PALMER:
Well, I would agree it is
not isolated instances. But
I would have to unpack some
of those statistics and look
at specific incidents in
order to give you a view as
to exactly how important
people are regarding a form
of bullying.
PAXMAN:
How many people have been
disciplined for bullying in
the last three years?
PALMER:
There are people being
disciplined as we speak
today.
PAXMAN:
How many?
PALMER:
Well, at the moment there
are about 30 people who are
being actively disciplined
for offences involving
harassment and bullying.
PAXMAN:
Do you say that 30 people
being investigated for
bullying or harassment in an
organisation of what, the
best part of 200,000 people,
anything like gets near
tackling the whole problem?
PALMER:
I certainly believe it does,
yes. Because I have
confidence in our
procedures, I have
confidence in the fact that
people are able to report
bullies and that these
people do get investigated
and they do get brought,
they do get disciplined.
PAXMAN:
Isn't the much more common
experience that of one of
the people that we spoke to,
who was seriously beaten up,
had people defecate in his
bed, urinate in his bed, and
when he complained about it
to his regimental Sergeant
Major, he was told: "F***
off, this is the army."
PALMER:
Well, no, I absolutely
refute that. That sounds to
me a completely exceptional
case, and if you let me know
the details, we will
certainly ensure it is
investigated. I come back to
my point, that the
overwhelming number of
people, and you've seen them
yourself, and so have your
reporters and colleagues
when they've been on
operations, they have the
most fantastic reputation,
and I do not believe that if
the bullying was to the
extent you say it is, within
the training organisation,
that they would have
performed the way they have.
PAXMAN:
No-one is questioning the
reputation of the British
Army as soldiers. They are
merely concerned about what
is a problem for some people
within the armed services.
Now you mentioned the
investigative mechanisms.
Isn't it entirely inadequate
that the people doing the
investigating are part of
the same chain of command as
those who do the bullying?
PALMER:
No, I mean the police do the
investigating, the special
investigation branch, which
is part of the armed forces
admittedly, but it is
independent and carries out
proper police procedures.
PAXMAN:
If we look at a slightly
older age group, those who
are coming up to be
suggested, perhaps, that it
was time they moved on
before they went on to their
22 years, is it acceptable
for a soldier to be called
in to see his CO, and for
the CO to, without looking
at him, just tell him to
sign a piece of paper and
the man then to have no
recourse afterwards? I mean
that...
PALMER:
It is totally unacceptable.
Totally unacceptable. And I
would say that it happens,
if it did happen, and we
will investigate it, but it
would be in a tiny
proportion of cases.
PAXMAN:
General, thank you.
This transcript was produced from the teletext subtitles that are generated live for Newsnight. It has been checked against the programme as broadcast, however Newsnight can accept no responsibility for any factual inaccuracies. We will be happy to correct serious errors.