Jurors were sent home
|
Soaring temperatures caused disruption in court on Wednesday with the heat
forcing two trials to be adjourned.
In one case, jurors deliberating a verdict described conditions as "intolerable".
Air conditioning at Leicester Crown Court struggled to cope and Judge John Burgess told a jury hearing an indecent assault case to go home at
1500 BST as temperatures nudged 77F (25C) in court one.
"I understand the air conditioning system cannot cope with the temperatures
endured today," he told the panel.
"It would be far more humane to send you home and start again tomorrow."
 |
HOT HOT HOT
|
It was a similar story in court two where jurors deliberating verdicts at the
end of a three-month trial sent a note to Judge Charles Wide QC.
The panel, in the second day of deliberations on charges against eight people
accused of conspiracy to cause grievous bodily harm, complained that conditions in the jury room
were "intolerable".
They could not concentrate without air conditioning or windows being opened
and the temperature inside was well into the 80s.
'Run' on air conditioners
As counsel and the judge discussed how to proceed, Sir Ivan Lawrence QC, for
one of the defendants, suggested buying a portable air conditioning system like
those on sale in markets "for about £100".
But Judge Wide said: "We have already made inquiries. It appears there has
been a bit of a run on them."
Arrangements were then made to allow the jury to deliberate in the courtroom
itself.
Documents were taken out and tables and chairs hastily brought in before the
jury was sent home for the night to resume their discussions on Thursday.