Newsnight Review discussed Fallout at the Royal Court.
(Edited highlights of the panel's review taken from the teletext subtitles that are generated live for Newsnight Review.)
TOM PAULIN:
What's so interesting about it is it's
technically what you would call
revisionist. In other words, it doesn't play
the grievance line or the victim line. It's
about black-on-black violence. It takes a
community apart. It refuses to put any
melody into the dialogue. When you read it
and when you hear it, it's like chewing
broken glass. It's at the bottom of the lift
shaft stuff. It's very, very basic, flawed,
wrecked, hopeless violent people, who
can't get out of the community they are in,
and who are not able and are not allowed
to blame anyone outside it. So you have a
sympathetic white policeman, a
sympathetic white teacher who also plays
the white policewoman in it. In other
words, it confronts certain ideological
ways of presenting black experience in this
country. It also refuses to play to what was
always attractive to me, which is the great
music of the black vernacular. It reduces it
to absolute chips.
KIRSTY WARK:
Paul Morley, I found it uncomfortable
finding the boys having such humour
among them. You know from the moment
you enter the play that they have mashed a
boy's head to bits, and yet the humour, I
found it very hard because I am laughing
with them when you know they have done
something absolutely hideous.
PAUL MORLEY:
It's a very tricky thing to come
to, this play. It gives a hint of a world that
we are so confused about and we are
trusting that Roy Williams is using the
correct slang.
TOM PAULIN:
Oh yes, he is.
PAUL MORLEY:
How do you know, Tom?
TOM PAULIN:
I know.
PAUL MORLEY:
I didn't realise you were of that world! I
think it was a great pilot for a fantastic TV
series. The black cop and the white cop. I
think it will make a fantastic TV series. It's
interesting that these people are going to
theatre now to do this kind of writing. For
me, I wanted to see this develop and I
wanted to see it go on to television. At
first, I thought, "That's a terrible thing to
say," because it's a kind of theatre, but
actually it is a compliment because it is
giving us something about the British
culture that we are just not really getting
anywhere. It was incredible to see it with a
different kind of audience, a less middle-
class audience, a black audience. They
were laughing at things and you don't
know whether to laugh with them - so it
was more complicated than just being a
pilot for a TV programme, but the fact it is
such a great pilot for a TV programme
shows it's a great piece of theatre.
JEANETTE WINTERSON:
On the night I went, there were only four
people in the audience, possibly because
they don't live behind Harrods. I thought
why aren't we showing this play in
Bradford or Tottenham instead of Sloane
Square. For me, there was no character
development or emotional journey. By the
end, I didn't know anything more about the
people or the situation than I knew at the
beginning. I did feel that a lot of the
language was hiding behind noise and
speed and movement, in order to disguise a
certain vacuity of thought. I wasn't
impressed by the language and I didn't feel
there was any muscle in the form behind it.
PAUL MORLEY:
I worry that some of the experiences in
there are cliché.
JEANETTE WINTERSON:
We are nervous of criticising it because we
don't live in that community.
TOM PAULIN:
I wanted a kind of aesthetic form. You
could say it's television. You've got a sort
of two-hour slab. But it's deliberately anti-
aesthetic. When you read it, you see that -
as when you hear it, the language is
pitched against the idea of any kind of
beauty. This is ugly, ugly, ugly basic
language. You could not use the English
language at a more basic level than this.
That's what's terrifying about it. What he is
saying, and he is saying this through the
black police officer played by Lennie
James brilliantly, in a complex way, is the
frustration with being trapped in these
attitudes and this language. That's what
he's representing.