BBC NEWS Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific
BBCi NEWS   SPORT   WEATHER   WORLD SERVICE   A-Z INDEX     

BBC News World Edition
 You are in: Programmes: Correspondent: Read your comments  
News Front Page
Africa
Americas
Asia-Pacific
Europe
Middle East
South Asia
UK
Business
Entertainment
Science/Nature
Technology
Health
-------------
Talking Point
-------------
Country Profiles
In Depth
-------------
Programmes
-------------
BBC Sport
BBC Weather
SERVICES
-------------
EDITIONS
Read your comments Monday, 2 June, 2003, 10:59 GMT 11:59 UK
Have your say
Al jazeera newsroom
Al-Jazeera was broadcast on BBC Two on Sunday, 1 June, 2003 at 2100 BST.

Have your say

Correspondent receives a high volume of e-mails after each programme. Only a representative number can be published following the programme.

We welcome an open exchange of opinion but stress that the BBC does not necessarily subscribe to any of the comments.


It's wrong to show any bodies! We're all mature enough to know what war is, and that people die, nothing good about it! But for either side to gloat over the slain is wrong in every way, and that's what they were doing. The media have a responsibility to be informative, it doesn't need to be morbid. It should be used to relay useful information for the benefit of the public, not relay images of the dead. Funny how (in the US) the media has nudity, and language, censored a great deal, but it's ok to view the images of war, even from al-Jazeera?!
Isaac, California/US

Excellent documentary on the Iraq war and the role of al-Jazeera. Credit to you for the impartiallity.
Yousuf Mulla

Thank the heavens for BBC. Americans can no longer rely on the news and information in this country. Without access to the BBC Americans, like myself, would get nothing but a steady diet of propaganda.
Debbie Johnson, USA

Dear BBC and the Correspondent team - I write in appreciation of the show aired last Sunday. It truly is refreshing to see that you have taken a brave decision and made it worthwhile to watch. Wars are not "clean" or "surgical" and only showing the side that our government wants us to see isn't justice to journalism. It also proved a great deal that the manner in which al-Jazeera approached the coverage of the Coalitions Forces' War against Iraq was shown to be professional, accurate, truthful and sincere. Keep up the good work.
Mohammad Ayoub, Oldham

Thank you for your balanced, professional broadcast about covering the Iraqi war. And a big thanks for the BBC as well. Keep up the good work lads.
Anon

Al-Jazeera was absolutely correct to show graphic images of dead and dying coaltion soldiers as well as Iraqi military personnel and civilians. They have shown the true face of war, rather than the sanitized presentations provided in western media. Of course the network had its own bias in the war, as did western media, but the viewer has a right to choose which stations they watch and the right to draw their own conclusions. Clearly it is important for all angles to be presented and for the individual to have the ability to draw on all prior to making their own assessment of a situation.
Ahmet, Turkey

The fact that ANYONE would even believe ANYTHING coming out of the American media machine these days is beyond comprehension. The "truth" is that only a handful of huge corporations own the radio and TV stations that deliver the news in this country, and not suprisingly they are connected to or employed directly by the "bushies" at hand. Case in point: the US Federal Communications Commission has decided to "relax" its rules on the limit of media companies one holding parent can "control". ugh.
Katie McBride, United States

This presents broadcasters with a real dilemma balancing sensitivity to the grief of the families with bringing home the realities of the situation to the wider public

Henry Mordaunt, UK
Firstly, it was an imaginative idea to commit a camera team and journalist to cover al-Jazeera during the war. Full marks to whoever thought up the idea and to those who approved it. Secondly, I think the programme was successful at challenging the inconsistencies in British/American attitudes to important issues involving the equal value of Iraqi life and dignity to British/American life and dignity - showing Iraqi casualties and prisoners is OK, showing British and American casualties and prisoners is evil. The (thankfully) small number of British casualties in the war means that any photographs of dead British soldiers are immediately identifiable to their families. This presents broadcasters with a real dilemma balancing sensitivity to the grief of the families with bringing home the realities of the situation to the wider public. I am glad I do not have to make such fine decisions. Well done BBC for the programme. As for the citicism before the programme over showing pictures of British casualties, I am afraid the great majority, who are tabloid readers, expect tabloid standards of insensitivity from all journalists. It is a cross you have to bear.
Henry Mordaunt, UK

Thank you for showing the public the REAL truth!!!!
Anon

Isn't it a little embarrassing? For decades now, various voices within the western societies were uttering demands for democratic development in the ME. Since Jean Jaques Rousseau pointed out the essential role of a free press as the fourth pillar of a democratic state this view was broadly accepted - at least in the western world. However, seemingly, the very same voices are now constantly criticising the Qatar-based broadcaster for showing "unsuitable" materials. Admittedly, the pattern of the European struggle for a free press can hardly be compared with the developments that led to the establishment of al-Jazeera. Yet the broadcaster has a crucial role in the whole ME. For it serves large segments within the Arab societies as a "local", perceptively not western-biased, source of information. Thereby, it balances the respective local, mostly state-controlled, media as well as CNN and BBC broadcastings. To call for a tighter control of Al-Jazeera by the state of Qatar equals an appeal for curbing the necessary condition for democratic development. This must appear quite hypocritical - not only in the eyes of Arabic-speaking people.
Marco Rettig, Germany (currently in Egypt)

Dear Correspondent editor - Thank you for this excellent programme you have produced about al-Jazeera, and I would like to thank the BBC for broadcasting the programme.
Mrs Faour

I decided to watch the programme, despite being concerned about the footage of the dead soldiers. In the end, much to my surprise, I thought the programme was justifed in showing them - it is shown alongside other footage of dead Iraqis and dead American soldiers.

We in the West normally get a watered version of war and death

Richard Haynes, England

One thing that disturbed me was the constant referrals by al-Jazeera to the reporter killed in Baghdad as a 'martyr' - terrible as it was, I don't see how such a term (implying a death in the cause of Islam) could be applied.
Graeme, UK

As for showing the bodies of dead servicemen in this documentary, it served absolutely no purpose and had no relevance to the rest of the programme. The pictures didn't have to be shown in the context of this programme.

Shabby, opportunistic sensationalism, no better than al-Jazeera's own dubious values and content. The BBC should be ashamed to call this programme 'journalism'.
Michael Thomas, UK

We in the West normally get a watered version of war and death and that does not deliver the full impact of what has happened. We need to be shocked and disgusted more at what goes in in the world. As to the Correspondent programme I thought the BBC and al-Jazeera were both courageous in what they broadcast. The truth of death in war needs to be broadcast.
Richard Haynes, England

Shabby, opportunistic sensationalism

Michael Thomas, UK

I felt that the international press, especially the American press, was out of line in reporting that al-Jazeera was breaking the Geneva Convention, when all the time they themselves where showing Iraqi prisioners of war and dead soliders. I am glad that you gave us the chance to see both sides of the war unlike most other channels and countries.
Ed Lane, UK

I found it informative, humane, impartial, enlightening and extremely poignant. Not only did it counter the perspective we seem to have gleaned over the past couple of years that somehow Al-Jazeera is complicit in the so called 'Muslim war' and the 'axis of evil', but it also shone a different and more powerful light on the nature of the second Gulf War.
Siobhan Pattinson, London

I did not watch the programme as I thought it was in very bad taste of the two soldiers who were tortured out there. No thought was given to the families and friends who have suffered enough. I know war has to be reported but it doesn't have to involve soldiers' deaths.
Karen Ball, UK

Just wanted to thank you for sticking to your guns for last night's Al-Jazeera programme, and to congratulate you for such an interesting report. It would have been foolish to remove footage relevant to the nature of the report, and I'm very pleased that the BBC resisted attempts to do this.
Andrew Yool, UK

I believe that you were wrong to go against the wishes of the families of these two soldiers

Norman Carter K.St.G HCR DL, UK

People have the right to receive unbiased information, or at least have easy access to several information sources with different perspectives. Al-Jazeera has the guts to stand up to a huge military might and they have paid a dear price for it (their offices being bombed first in Afghanistan and then in Iraq can hardly be a coincidence). There should be more news channels like Al-Jazeera.
Marlise Jud, Switzerland

I respect the BBC's commitment to open and forthright broadcasting, I in fact commend them in their approach to many subjects that have been mistreated by other not so noteworthy networks. However, in this instant I believe that you were wrong to go against the wishes of the families of these two soldiers.

Primarily because there must have been sufficient shock footage or other ways of securing, the public interest without being disrespectful to those concerned.
Norman Carter K.St.G HCR DL, UK

I am absolutely horrified that you showed pictures of dead British soldiers on your programme. What damage have you done to their friends and families? I am disgusted at you, the programme makers, and the BBC for allowing it.
Kate Phillips, UK

Contrary to how the West has portrayed the TV company, it is not a group of immoral zealots trying to outdo the Western media. Indeed, their reporting seemed infinitely more balanced than CNN or Fox. War is ugly, disturbing and viscous. The Al-Jazeera team were simply reminding us of this. That was in contrast to the sanitised spin and drivel the coalition tried to feed us. Frankly, we need stations like Al-Jazeera to counterbalance the heavily-biased reporting we get in these situations.
Nick, UK

It was 'good' to see the war from a different perspective

Tristan
I think instead of playing blame games amongst news channels, a unified and globally accepted convention should be adopted as to what kind of images should or should not be shown. And all news channels must strictly follow its guidelines. And if it cannot be done, then no news channel should be blamed for any controversy.
Imran Khan, Canada

An excellent film that detailed the reporting of a truly independent television channel, and this was well documented in the film. Showing the way that Al-Jazeera dealt with both sides of the war enabled the viewer to form ones own opinion of their coverage. Well done BBC.
John Allen, UK

The Correspondent special on Al Jazeera was very commendable, not to mention brave. It was an example of the high standard and broad range of BBC reporting. Al Jazeera was so much part of the news during the recent war that this opportunity to witness their team at work provided much needed balance.
Richard Anderson, Britain

The BBC is no better than Al Jazeera in showing the footage originally

Mr CM Gulvin
Thanks for balanced and informative reporting on Al-Jazeera. It was 'good' to see the war from a different perspective, see people reporting a war in which they were intimately involved. However hard and appalling it is to show images of dead and injured people, this is the stark and painful reality of war. It seems until now only Al-Jezeera were brave enough to show this type of image, thanks for being brave enough to show them as well.
Tristan, Scotland

It's worth remembering that there is very little freedom of press in the Middle East - I wonder how this changes the way Al- Jazeera works. I don't believe they can be objective when they broadcast to and from oppressive dictatorships and monarchies.
Peter Davis, UK

Those complaining about dead British servicemen are entirely missing the point of this documentary. A simply brilliant piece of journalism. Thank you.
Kate Smith, UK

I can only imagine the pressure those involved in tonight's programme must have been under. Well done for tonight's programme, good balanced reporting. Although the headlines will be about the very short clip about the British dead, the question I would ask is how many people turned off the News while watching Iraq's dead during the conflict? Sadly I would not imagine that many.
Pete Cowan

I had hoped, not prayed, that the footage of both dead and injured Coalition soldiers would be appropriate to the programme. I now know this was not the case. The programme did not need to show this footage to portray a programme about an Arab television station. Indeed the BBC is no better than Al Jazeera in showing the footage originally.
Mr CM Gulvin

News must be shown - even when it is bad

Simon Anthony
I found the use of that footage to be entirely in context with the overall thrust of the programme which I believe portrayed Al Jazzera as a professional news provider. I value the courage of all journalists who place themselves at risk to provide me with information I could not otherwise access. Even more, I value the organisations who employ those journalists to stand apart from governments and spin doctors and honestly report what they see whether the images or words are deeply uncomfortable.
Andy Renals, UK

As a former British soldier, I am adhering to a call from several sources to boycott the BBC today. I feel very strongly that the wishes of the families of the 2 soldiers, whose bodies we are told will appear on your Correspondent programme tonight, should be paramount.
Pete Holmes, Devon

I worked for several years on British TV news programs - I felt every moment with them. News must be shown - even when it is bad. People must know - and see that people die in wars. Then, maybe they will less likely to do the killing and more likely to find another way. My way will be to vote Green as often as I can.
Simon Anthony, UK

I do not see the benefit to anyone by showing this morose image

John Watson
Have you no compassion? How would you like it if it was your son, husband, brother or father. Try putting yourself in the other person's shoes for a change. I did not watch this programme and I am sure anyone who has a heart did not watch either
N Ireland

I think it is totally inappropriate to show the bodies of the dead British Royal Engineers killed in Iraq. I do not see the benefit to anyone by showing this morose image. I think the families of these men have been through enough and do not need things like this bringing up again.
John Watson, UK

Thank you to all concerned for making and broadcasting your programme tonight 1st June 2003, this is a new bench mark in media freedom. Thank you
DLH

A very well documented programme about other good news stations other than CNN and the Beeb

Fawzi Haffar
I agree and appreciate that the coverage seen by the Arab states will be completely different to those seen in the UK, propaganda prevails on both side of conflict, but does this give permissions to see dead British servicemen on our screens? I feel that compassion and respect should be given to those who gave their lives and also the same levels of compassion should be given to those families that also have to pay the ultimate price of war.
M and S Jones

Well done BBC, a very well documented programme about good news stations other than CNN and the Beeb. Let's have some more of these productions
Fawzi Haffar, England

I would like to thank the BBC for putting on such a wonderful documentary, showing the efforts of true journalism worldwide. An excellent programme - well-covered.
Sofia , UK

As a former British soldier, I am adhering to a call from several sources to boycott the BBC today

Pete Holmes
As you have already shown photographs of these brave servicemen on news programmes, to now suggest they will be unrecognisable is absurd. I don't suppose you will be showing British troops 'dancing' on top of Iraqi vehicles celebrating the soldier's deaths, will you? Any point you are trying to make will be lost as I for one, and I am sure many others will not be watching.
Dave Bowen

Send us your comments:

Name:


Your E-mail address:


Country:


Comments:


Disclaimer: The BBC will put up as many of your comments as possible but we cannot guarantee that all e-mails will be published. The BBC reserves the right to edit comments that are published.


 E-mail this story to a friend

Links to more Read your comments stories

© BBC ^^ Back to top

News Front Page | Africa | Americas | Asia-Pacific | Europe | Middle East |
South Asia | UK | Business | Entertainment | Science/Nature |
Technology | Health | Talking Point | Country Profiles | In Depth |
Programmes