![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Monday, January 4, 1999 Published at 07:49 GMT Education Heads critical of school inspections ![]() Doug McAvoy says inspections are causing unnecessary disruption Head and deputy-headteachers do not believe that inspections motivate staff or improve standards.
Instead the experience of headteachers is of stressed staff and disruption, with one respondent describing the inspectors' visit as "the most intimidating experience of my life. The whole effect on upon staff and pupils was negative."
But there was better news for the Office for Standards in Education inspectors in other aspects of the survey, with opinion evenly divided over whether the inspectors' judgements were fair and accurate. Even though individual testimonies from the NUT's respondents describe inspectors as "aggressive" and "abrasive", the survey shows that almost half of the headteachers believed that the inspectors "established a professional dialogue with teachers".
The anonymous comments from headteachers that accompany the union survey present a bleak picture of schools shell-shocked by the inspection process.
In another report, a headteacher said that "the Ofsted inspection resulted in an overload of work, demoralised and stressed staff and had a detrimental effect on children's learning ... as a manager I found it difficult to remotivate staff and believe the Ofsted experience has a negative effect on teaching and learning". The NUT's General Secretary, Doug McAvoy, said that the survey showed that the stress and extra work created by inspections could not be justified. "Both in their responses and comments, heads and deputies have given a thumbs down to the present system of inspections. Overwhelmingly they say that the ends do not justify the means. Inspection does not lead directly to school improvement," Mr McAvoy said. |
Education Contents
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||