![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Monday, January 4, 1999 Published at 09:58 GMT UK Politics Mandelson branded back-stabber ![]() The Mirror calls Peter Mandelson a "schemer in a nest of vipers" Former trade secretary Peter Mandelson faces further embarrassment after the publication of a leaked letter in which he urged Gordon Brown not to stand for the leadership of the Labour Party.
It is a further embarrassment to Mr Mandelson, who resigned just before Christmas after admitting accepting a £373,000 loan from former paymaster general Geoffrey Robinson, who also quit.
'Knifed in the back' But he says the Hartlepool MP was a friend of Mr Brown's at the time and says the letter shows he "knifed him squarely between the shoulder blades". In the letter, Mr Mandelson flattered Mr Brown, calling him "the biggest intellectual force and strategic thinker the party has".
Mr Mandelson warned the shadow chancellor if he stood it would split the vote and allow in people such as Foreign Secretary Robin Cook. He said Mr Brown would be "blamed by the media" for creating the split. Hunt on for 'sneak' The leaked letter is bound to reopen divisions between the Brown and Blair camps within Labour. Labour's spin doctors will no doubt be desperate to find out who leaked it to Mr Routledge.
Speaking on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Mr Routledge said the leak had not come from Mr Whelan, who had pleaded with him not to write the book as he would be blamed for the content.
He said: "I was waiting for something to happen, because I knew somebody had got hold of it. "Then, I knew Mandelson's people were offering a 'big story' about Robinson which they wanted to do before Christmas." Pre-emptive strike He added: "Whoever stole the story talked to the Mandelson camp and they decided rather than waiting to come out in the book they would take a pre-emptive strike."
"Peter and Gordon won't let the Mirror play one off against the other to hurt the government. Everyone involved in the issue is relaxed by the re-publication of this document." But the Conservatives have seized on the story as fresh evidence of a "civil war" within Labour. |
UK Politics Contents
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||