![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wednesday, December 23, 1998 Published at 21:35 GMT World: Asia-Pacific Beijing talks tough on dissidents ![]() After Xu Wenli's imprisonment, China's dissidents face renewed pressure By BBC Correspondent Carrie Gracie in Beijing China's Communist Party leader, Jiang Zemin, has urged the country's judicial authorities to crush any attempt to undermine political stability. Addressing a law enforcement conference broadcast on national television news, he said any attempt to undermine national security must be nipped in the bud. In a speech peppered with references to hostile forces abroad and dissatisfaction among laid-off workers at home, Jiang Zemin warned that the 50th anniversary of Communist Party rule and the return to China of the Portuguese colony of Macao would make 1999 a vital year for China. Preserving stability was paramount, he said. Publishers warned
After the prison sentences handed down earlier this week to three veteran dissidents - between 11 and 13 years each - no one will take such threats lightly. An intellectual community, which only a few months ago had been emboldened by an apparent relaxation in the political mood, is now likely to return to mouthing the Communist Party's slogans. Appeal to UN But defiance is not entirely dead. On Wednesday four intellectuals sent a letter to the UN Secretary-General, Kofi Annan, appealing for international pressure on Beijing. Western governments have already protested over the dissident trials. For British Prime Minister Tony Blair, and the United States President, Bill Clinton, these events were a double disappointment. Both leaders visited China earlier this year, and argued that a softly-softly approach to the human rights dialogue with Beijing was the best strategy. They pointed to China's signing of the UN Covenant on Civil and Political Rights as a sign of progress. But the imprisonment of Chinese citizens for the crime of trying to organise their own political party makes it clear that Beijing's definition of the freedoms of expression and association is very much narrower than that of London or Washington. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||