![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wednesday, December 23, 1998 Published at 10:51 GMT
US withdraws Iraq troops ![]() Enough US troops will remain to counter Saddam, said Cohen United States Defence Secretary William Cohen says the US is reducing its presence in the Gulf following last week's air strikes on Iraq.
This follows news that the US has declared it is prepared to allow Iraq to sell more oil, so it can buy more food and medicine.
"We have the ability to react very quickly so we're satisfied that our day-to-day force is adequate," he said.
An unnamed UN official said: "The Iraqis told us that all UN flights are banned until further notice." Before the air strikes, UN planes flew regularly into Habania airport and were used extensively by UN weapons inspectors as well as Mr Shah, the special representative of Secretary-General Kofi Annan in Baghdad. 'Tool to justify military action' Meanwhile, one former Unscom inspector has accused Britain and the US of using out of date information to justify the air strikes on Iraq, while weapons inspections centred on sites intended to provoke the Iraqis. Scott Ritter, the former head of the UN weapons inspection team in Iraq, said data on which inspections were based was often "months, maybe years old".
Mr Ritter blamed the US for that provocation, and said Unscom chief weapons inspector Richard Butler was also guilty for complying with American pressure. Mr Butler had "allowed the United States to manipulate the work of Unscom in such a fashion as to justify an air strike". The problem was not deadlines for inspection, but manipulation of the process so it became a "tool to justify military action", Mr Ritter said.
"Nothing was gained from these strikes, and much was lost, to include Unscom itself," he said. "It's ironic that strikes done ostensibly to save Unscom have killed it, and this should underscore the utter ineffective nature of these strikes." |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||