![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tuesday, December 22, 1998 Published at 23:59 GMT Sci/Tech Computer to rival Mozart ![]() Prof Cope: "Mozart would have loved it" By our science editor Dr David Whitehouse What makes a great composer? Will a computer ever create works that rank among those of Mozart and Beethoven? Before you answer, listen to these examples of computer compositions and reflect that it was once said machines would never beat us at chess. David Cope, a composer and professor of music at the University of California, has created a program that analyses the music of masters and then makes its own in their style.
He has used his program, called Experiments in Musical Intelligence, to recreate work in the style of Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Stravinsky, Joplin and many others. Looking for patterns, it extracts musical signatures; stylescommon to different compositions by the same composer. "For the most part, music theorists extract the value of chords. This program examines the way they move in relation to one another," he says.
So what do people think of synthetic classical music?
The computer can quantify why Mozart sounds unlike Beethoven or Bach. It suggests the difference between these great composers is more in the detail than first thought.
"It has fooled many people, including myself. Once I had to take a real example of Bach's music and a computer-generated one to a conference. I took two computer pieces by mistake. "But quality is in the ear of the beholder. It may be that knowing music is written by a computer will bias people against its merits." Listening to the computer music, Anthony Pople, Professor of Music at the University of Southampton in England said: "It does sound like music that follows the style of the composer but it does not always do the right thing all the time.
"I would probably think it was music by a lesser-known contemporary of Mozart who was not as good." But is the computer good enough to be considered a composer in its own right and not just a machine that produces poorer variations of the masters? It is a question that all human composers face. When do they find an original voice?
Anthony Pople believes computers have a place in the study of music, usually thought of as an essentially human activity. "If the computer operated at a higher level and got at the essence of musical innovation then it might produce something fresh. Then I would be impressed. "I think computers are going to tell us about the fundamentals of music over the next 20 years or so." David Cope says his computer has already written valuable, credible music - a composer in its own right. "It has convinced me it is a unique composer. Bach and Mozart would have loved it." |
Sci/Tech Contents
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||