![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tuesday, December 1, 1998 Published at 08:34 GMT
Blair opts to delay E-Day ![]() Tony Blair once described the issue of European Monetary Union (EMU) - and whether the UK would join - as "probably the most important decision this country is likely to face in our generation". Within a few months of becoming prime minister Mr Blair made his mind up: he decided to put off making a decision. He had already, in the run-up to the election, announced that a Labour government would not join the European single currency until voters agreed to do so in a referendum. But he had also insisted that it was important to keep the option open in order to maintain "any influence we have over the process".
That decision dismayed Labour's pro-Europeans. A referendum on joining the euro was always going to be a tricky thing to win with the Tories and the Sun newspaper guaranteed to run a ferocious, Union Jack-waving "save the pound" campaign. But instead of ruling out the poll, was holding it straight away not an obvious solution - fresh after Labour's election victory, and with the party enjoying sky-high opinion poll ratings that could not last? "We discussed that option long into the night," says one pro-EMU minister involved in the discussions on how to handle the issue. But in the end Mr Blair opted for delaying the euro's E-Day. Knock-on effects of delay
The prime minister and his cabinet soon came to regret this as the knock-on effects of that decision became apparent. The announcement that the UK would not be joining before the next general election certainly contributed to the strength of the pound, as the financial markets correctly calculated UK interest rates would remain higher than in other, Emu-joining countries across the EU.
European politics moved into a different direction as well. With Gerhard Schröder winning the German elections in September, 13 of the 15 EU countries were ruled by centre-left governments. More importantly, France and Germany - which had historically acted as the joint-powerhouse of European integration - now had administrations in place that were significantly more left-wing than Labour.
The realistic possibility of a Europe-wide neo-Keynesian, reflationary economic policy was suddenly back on the agenda in Brussels. Pro-Europeans within Labour began wondering if Tony Blair was destined to be isolated within the EU in a way similar to that of his predecessor, John Major. Tory trouble Of course, Labour is far from alone in having serious problems over EMU. All the main political parties have found it a thorny issue. The single currency has caused the most serious split in the Conservative Party since World War II. It was at the root of the resignations from Margaret Thatcher's cabinet that paved the way for the leadership challenge that eventually toppled her as prime minister in 1990.
He hoped that would put the issue to rest and allow the Tories a clear run at painting Labour as the party that would lead the UK into being engulfed by some kind of federal European super-state. Things have not worked out that way for Mr Hague. Whenever he launches a Euro-sceptic attack on the government, he only highlights the opposition's own internal divisions as big-name pro-European Tories rush to disagree with him.
The Conservatives have no such luxury. Ex-Tory cabinet members like Kenneth Clarke, Chris Patten and Michael Heseltine - all far better known to the public than Mr Hague - have made clear they are likely to campaign against the party line in a referendum. Lib Dems backtrack Even the Liberal Democrats, the most EMU-friendly of the three main parties, have felt the need to backtrack on their Euro-enthusiasm.
Mr Ashdown's latest outline of his vision of Europe's future included proposals for a constitution for the EU and a statute of limitations detailing which responsibilities lie with Brussels and which with nation states. Referendum worries All the main political parties have, in their own ways, formulated their EMU policies with one eye looking over their shoulders at the populist anti-single currency majority in the UK press and the task of converting the public to the idea of switching from the pound to the euro. One thing is sure. When the government does grasp the nettle of holding a referendum on joining the single currency it will be, in the words of one minister, "the mother of all campaigns". |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||