![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Saturday, October 24, 1998 Published at 18:26 GMT 19:26 UK World: Asia-Pacific Hundreds arrested in Malaysia riots ![]() Some demonstrators were chased though department stores More than 240 people were arrested in the Malaysian capital, Kuala Lumpur, as hundreds of supporters of the jailed former Deputy Prime Minister, Anwar Ibrahim, clashed with police.
Police used tear gas and water cannon after a large crowd gathered chanting for reform.
Police in balaclavas chased people through department stores, beating some of them. The city's police chief said his men had seized several petrol bombs and hundreds of pamphlets calling for reform. The BBC Kuala Lumpur correspondent says the authorities are clearly determined to clamp down on any form of dissent, with an Asia-Pacific summit due to be held in the Malaysian capital in three weeks. Chemical irritant
Pro-reform demonstrators threw stones and rocks at the police, who responded by firing tear gas and water cannon containing a powerful chemical irritant to break up the demonstration. Protestors later regrouped in another location and again water cannon was used to disperse them. Some of the demonstrators regrouped, and there were violent scenes as police - some plain clothed, others in balaclavas - arrested people in the crowd, including several women.
Most were since released on bail, but police are now warning those who join the protests that they could face arrest under the Internal Security Act, which allows for indefinite detainment without trial.
He faces trial next month on four out of 10 counts of corruption and sodomy - charges he says are part of a high-level political vendetta. One of the two main witnesses against him now says he was stripped, humiliated and brainwashed in custody before telling police he had committed sodomy with Mr Anwar. Mr Anwar's wife has called for foreign observers to be allowed to attend the trial after the prime minister reportedly said that they would not be permitted in court because it would put pressure on the judges. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||