| You are in: Americas | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tuesday, 21 May, 2002, 14:53 GMT 15:53 UK
Canada court mulls patenting GM animals
Mice have been modified to contract cancer more easily
Canada's Supreme Court is hearing arguments on Tuesday about whether scientists should be allowed to patent the genetically modified animals they create.
The case centres on the Oncomouse, developed by Harvard scientists to be especially susceptible to cancer, and therefore valuable to research.
But Harvard's lawyers say granting a patent on genetically modified life provides a valuable incentive for scientists, and helps them turn discoveries in the laboratory into cures for diseases. Invention or not? The United States and Europe allowed patents on the mouse some years ago, and some say if Canada does not, the country will be left behind in the competitive world of scientific research. But opponents say this process may not end with the mouse. "It is a hugely important case," said Clayton Ruby, a lawyer representing three animal-rights groups intervening in the case.
The case has wound its way though Canada's courts since the country's patent commissioner and a lower court agreed in 1998 that, under the country's patent law, passed in 1869, the mouse did not qualify as an "invention". Two years later, however, the appeals court overturned those decisions and ruled that a patent should be granted - prompting the commissioner to send the case to the Supreme Court. The patent application also includes the process by which the cancer-causing gene is implanted, and is not restricted to just mice.
European controversy The Oncomouse patent granted by the European Patent Office in 1992 has also been controversial. It was challenged last year by a range of animal-rights groups, environmentalists and churches. The patent was then revised to cover only mice with the cancer gene. Canada's Supreme Court is expected to make a ruling in a few months. If allowed, it would be the first time a patent had been granted in Canada on a multi-celled life form, setting an important precedent. But the ruling would not apply to human beings. |
See also:
12 Jan 01 | In Depth
23 Aug 01 | Americas
04 Aug 00 | Science/Nature
12 May 98 | Science/Nature
13 May 02 | Americas
30 Apr 02 | South Asia
02 Apr 02 | Country profiles
Internet links:
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites Top Americas stories now:
Links to more Americas stories are at the foot of the page.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Links to more Americas stories |
![]() |
||
| ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> | To BBC World Service>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII | News Sources | Privacy |