BBC NEWS Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific Arabic Spanish Russian Chinese Welsh
BBCi CATEGORIES   TV   RADIO   COMMUNICATE   WHERE I LIVE   INDEX    SEARCH 

BBC NEWS
 You are in:  World
Front Page 
World 
Africa 
Americas 
Asia-Pacific 
Europe 
Middle East 
South Asia 
-------------
From Our Own Correspondent 
-------------
Letter From America 
UK 
UK Politics 
Business 
Sci/Tech 
Health 
Education 
Entertainment 
Talking Point 
In Depth 
AudioVideo 


Commonwealth Games 2002

BBC Sport

BBC Weather

SERVICES 
Wednesday, 6 February, 2002, 15:41 GMT
Lockerbie prosecutors reject claims
Frankfurt Main
The defence said the suitcase could have been loaded in Frankfurt
Prosecutors at the appeal of the man convicted of the Lockerbie bombing have rejected claims that key evidence in the original trial was misinterpreted.

Advocate-Depute Allan Turnbull QC said evidence presented in the trial of Abdelbasset al-Megrahi was properly evaluated.

Defence lawyers had argued the trial judges did not accept criticisms of security failures at Frankfurt Airport.

They said that rather than the suitcase bomb being loaded at Malta as the prosecution had claimed, it could have joined the flight in Germany.

Abdelbasset al-Megrahi
Al-Megrahi: Appeal
Al-Megrahi, a former Libyan security agent, was found guilty last year of loading a suitcase bomb in Malta, which was then transferred via Frankfurt onto Pan Am Flight 103.

The plane was blown up over the Scottish town of Lockerbie on its way from London's Heathrow Airport to New York, killing 270 people.

Testimony from baggage handlers and computer luggage records from Frankfurt were an important part of the prosecution case that the bomb originated in Malta, where al-Megrahi was seen buying clothing found in the wreckage.

Al-Megrahi was sentenced to life imprisonment for his role but will be eligible for parole in 20 years.

His lawyers opened their appeal on 23 January asking the appeal court to admit new testimony they claim could overturn the conviction of their client.

Appeal judges

Defence attorney William Taylor QC disputed prosecution evidence that the bomb must have started its fatal journey in Malta.

He argued that it could have been smuggled onto the New York-bound plane elsewhere and by someone else.

Mr Turnbull told the appeal judges that defence lawyers had failed to prove that anyone other than al-Megrahi's carried out the attack.

"There is no record of what the appellant says may have happened," he said.

The appeal hearing was heard in the same makeshift courtroom at Camp Zeist, a former air force base in the Netherlands, that the original nine-month trial was held in 2000.

Lockerbie megapuff graphic

AUDIO VIDEO

Key stories

Features

The trial
See also:

Internet links:


The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

Links to more World stories are at the foot of the page.


E-mail this story to a friend

Links to more World stories