| You are in: Talking Point | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Monday, 8 January, 2001, 11:07 GMT
Flexible working: Is this the way of the future?
![]() New research claims that senior managers with flexible working arrangements out-perform those who work a conventional 9 to 5 day.
Disclaimer: The BBC will put up as many of your comments as possible but we cannot guarantee that all e-mails will be published. The BBC reserves the right to edit comments that are published.According to the British Psychological Society, arrangements such as job-sharing or working reduced hours lead to a huge improvement in performance. Seventy per cent of those in the study showed more resilience, leadership and commitment. If you have flexible working arrangements, has the experience been a success for you? Are flexible working arrangements the way of the future?
The Government needs to get real! Employees are being encouraged to demand the right to guaranteed pay and a full raft of employment and family rights in exchange for work if and when they feel like it. Employers are threatened with discrimination actions if they refuse part-time or flexible hours requests. The needs of customers, clients and employers come a poor second. Not many jobs which involve highly skilled project work are suitable for flexible working.
Peter, UK
I have always been flexible with my employer. Early shifts, late shifts, night shifts. I then left the NHS as they thought flexibility was medical terminology and they said they'd get back to me. Also those with families get priority shifts and time off at Christmas and the Scottish New Year. I left just before New Year 2000 as they banned anyone taking time off. Give me a 9-5 anyday.
Chris, Japan (British)
I would not work for a company that did not give me flexibility - I work from home about two days a week and that is perfect.
I work as productively (if not more so) than anybody else in the office.
Old style management needs to wake up!
As always, it's not the hours you work; it's the work you put in the hours.
Gerry, Scotland
I have worked flexible hours for about the last ten years first in the UK and now in Switzerland. I find it to be a very positive way to work. The companies I have worked for have employed a "core" hours system whereby you must be in the office between 10am and midday and again between 2pm and 4pm. This doesn't mean that we all come in at 10 take a 2 hour lunch and then go home at 4pm, it means that those people who prefer to get in early and leave early can and those (like me) who like a lie in can get to work at 10am without being branded late.
I believe this system benefits all employees by allowing an element of self-regulation and control in ones working environment. A system of flexible work hours allows people to fit their work into their lives and not the other way around, this makes for happier and more productive employees.
Flexi-working is fine as long as job requirements are met. In other words, there should be a flexible approach to flexi-working, with honesty and trust between people.
I think Will is wrong in making such a blanket assumption - there may be certain jobs that do not readily lend themselves to flexi-working, but there are many that do, and the benefits are proven. If only more companies would adopt it!
I like flexible arrangements. Sometimes I'm in the office at 7:00, sometimes at 9:30, sometimes I work from home and in three weeks I start the 4 day week with a 3 day weekend. As long as neither the employer or the employee get short-changed it's the best system there is. I'm more motivated than ever and do not feel like a zombie anymore who slaves for his employer.
Andy, UK
Currently I work 9-6 and I spend
4 hours a day commuting. By the
time I get home everything is shut and
so the evening is spent either going
to the pub or TV. 90% of the time I'm
too knackered to do anything other than
lie face-down on the sofa.
So, yes, I think flexi-time works!
Our company has adopted what is known as a 9/80 schedule which, during each two week period, requires working 9 hours a day Monday to Thursday, working 8 hours on the first Friday but having the second Friday off. The resulting alternating three-day weekends are marvellous stress reducers and still allow the work to get done. Coverage is maintained by employees alternating Off Fridays. This is not, as Will, UK suggests, pandering to our weaknesses, but using the time to benefit both the company and the employee. Next Friday I will enjoy thinking of him slaving in his dark, dank, Dickensian workhouse as I relax on the deck in the sun. I work to live, not live to work.
Absolutely, otherwise I wouldn't have the flexibility to surf the web when I wanted!
Sue D, UK
Yes, Will is right. Nothing gets done very fast.
Late in, early home and little to show for most days.
This 'flexi' way of working does not work. Teams
arrive offset from each other and co-ordination is out of the
window. I have lived it for 3 years and now I want everyone
back on 9-5 so we know when we can meet and get work done!
I am a working mother with 2 schoolchildren. Until recently I worked at least 8:30-6:00 each day for a software house. Recently I moved to another company and now work school hours during term time only. Not only has my productivity improved, I have lost weight and am sleeping normally.
As I am working on the same project as before, I can only assume that the reduction in 'working' hours has reduced my stress levels.
I have friends who are now telecommuting, in the new arena of web server management. Whilst they can work from the comfort of their homes, their working days are now without structure.
They often have to work until a problem is solved - perhaps until 5 or 6am. Then 10am.. and onward into another working cycle without a defined end point, working until exhaustion stops them. Waking when their strength returns. Working weeks are now 7 days long, and working days at least 12 hours. SO flexible working hours and practices such as telecommuting are a double- edged sword.
Flexible working hours can be successful but tend to be a problem when there is a necessity to work as a team. If you depend on others to get work done and they work different hours, it requires much more discipline and control to ensure that the team unit can function.
Emma, US
I think that flexible working is a good idea, however, you have to apply some more control to it.
There is always going to be the one who takes profit of such opportunity and try to work as less
as he/she can. Some people cannot adapt to this system and we should we capable to recognise
them.
Some companies allow flexible working hours both at home and in the office, others are not so flexible.
For it to work very well, the companies have to be well organised with well-defined work/tasks.
Unfortunately being so well organised/structured is not always the top priority and all too often this means people have to be in the office.
I have been enjoying the relative freedom to organise my own time offered by flexi-time for around fifteen years. I am now a specialist within the organisation I work for, a unique non-managerial post in a company employing almost 250 people and that is due to expand to over 400 later this year.
Flexible working was once described to me as "unpaid overtime", as you work extra hours when the workload is high and take time off when the workload is light. People therefore invariably work "unconventional" i.e. late/early hours at no extra pay. Flexi-time does have its advantages of course - time off for picking kids up, taking them to school, and so on. So long as managers do not exploit their staff's willingness to work extra/fewer hours as and when it is necessary, flexi- time I believe is a good thing.
Having worked both sides of this fence I can say flexi-time is much more civilised. It is rarely abused (as the scaremongers would have us believe) and so long as co-operation and guidelines are in place, almost any industry can offer it.
MN, UK
No way - it just pampers to our weaknesses - "I can't be bothered". What sort of society will that create? Good Luck America - I bet it's big over there.
|
Internet links:
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites
Other Talking Points:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Links to more Talking Point stories
|
|
|
^^ Back to top News Front Page | World | UK | UK Politics | Business | Sci/Tech | Health | Education | Entertainment | Talking Point | In Depth | AudioVideo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII | News Sources | Privacy |
|