![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Monday, June 8, 1998 Published at 12:08 GMT 13:08 UK UK Politics Pension sharing - rationale Pension sharing will come into force after the year 2000 In opposition, Labour supported 'pension splitting' and since coming to office it has committed itself to moving to the 'splitting' method, but calling it "pension sharing." Pension sharing is expected to apply to all divorces for which proceedings begin after April 2000. This system will mean that on divorce each ex-spouse will have a pension in their own right until they die. Who will benefit? This system will mainly benefit divorced women in the future. Women tend to have lower pensions than men because they often spend less of their working lives in paid work. They often have career breaks to have children and are therefore at a disadvantage in occupational pensions. So pension sharing will benefit women more than the current earmarking system (see below). Background Until 1995, in England and Wales, the treatment of pensions when couples divorced was rather vague. The Matrimonial Causes Act of 1973 allowed courts to take pensions into account in a divorce settlement, but they did not have to. Even if the pension or pensions were taken into account when calculating a couples assets, there was no power to transfer part of a pension between spouses. The last Conservative government was initially reluctant to do anything to change this position, but eventually responded to pressure particularly from women's groups, and as part of the Pensions Act 1995, introduced a system called 'earmarking.' Earmarking The Pensions Act 1995 stated that courts have a duty to consider the pension entitlement of both parties to the divorce. More fundamentally, a Court Order can require trustees to -
Why the need for change?
Earmarking orders give pension schemes extra administrative work, because they have to keep a record of the order, keep track of the member and the ex-spouse and comply with some complex rules if the member transfers to another scheme. The earmarking system is based on the Cash Equivalent Transfer Value (CETV). Often the CETV is said to give the lowest possible value for determining the loss of pension rights and will result in lower amounts being awarded to the divorcing party without pension rights. Under this arrangement, there is no financial break between the couple and they are not allowed to break free completely from the marriage. Facts and figures Women are less likely than men to belong to an occupational pension scheme. In 1991 only 3.9m women belonged to an occupational scheme, compared to 6.8m men. Women's occupational pensions are worth less on average then men's. Figures show that women aged 65-69 have an average income from occupational pensions of just £22 a week, compared to £67 for men. Women are less likely to have a personal pension. Only 22% of women who work full-time have a personal pension, compared to 28% of men. Women are therefore more likely to suffer from poverty in old age than men - 70% of the 2m people over the age of 60 who depend on Income Support are women. In addition, 75% of the 1m pensioners who do not claim the Income Support to which they are entitled and who lose on average £14 a week are women. |
UK Politics Contents
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||