BBC Homepage World Service Education
BBC Homepagelow graphics version | feedback | help
BBC News Online
 You are in: World: Middle East
Front Page 
Middle East 
South Asia 
From Our Own Correspondent 
Letter From America 
UK Politics 
Talking Point 
In Depth 

BBC defence correspondent Jonathan Marcus
"The new missiles singularly failed to perform"
 real 28k

Thursday, 22 February, 2001, 14:21 GMT
Smart bombs 'missed Iraqi targets'
Doctors treat boy who Baghdad says was injured in the strikes
Baghdad says the attacks killed three and wounded 30
Pentagon officials have admitted that most of the bombs dropped by US and British warplanes on Iraq last Friday missed their targets.

A senior defence official in Washington told Associated Press that the strikes - launched in retaliation for alleged attacks on allied air patrols - had been given "about a B minus or a C plus" in terms of accuracy.

Baghdad sky lit up by allied bombs
The strikes lit up the Baghdad sky
Last Friday's attacks sparked protests around the world, and inflamed UN-Iraqi relations, souring the atmosphere ahead of key talks aimed at paving the way for a lifting of the decade-old embargo on Iraq.

The revelations from the Pentagon come amid repeated US accusations that Chinese workers are in Baghdad - in breach of UN sanctions - installing fibre-optic cables to be used in Iraq's air defence.

China denied the allegation again on Thursday, saying it was to divert the outcry against the air strikes.

Weapon limitations

Stories that so-called "smart bombs" have gone off course are not new.

Last August, it emerged that the accuracy rate of bombs dropped by British forces during the 1999 Kosovo conflict was only 40%.

Palestinians protest against attacks on Iraq
The strikes sparked protests around the world
Pentagon spokesman Rear Admiral Craig Quigley said the missiles fired at Iraq last week had achieved their purpose of "disrupting and degrading" radar systems near Baghdad.

But he also acknowledged the limitations of the strikes: "It isn't perfect. It never is."

Officials quoted by AP, however, say America's newest precision-guided bombs performed far worse than that, hitting fewer than 50% of targeted radars.

'New generation'

RAF Tornado
The RAF: "Content with success rate"
Analysts say the new bombs should be highly accurate because they rely on satellites rather than lasers, giving them an all-weather capability lacking in earlier versions of smart munitions.

Twenty-five individual aim points were targeted and the Pentagon can only confirm damage at eight of them.

One official, quoted in the Washington Post, said he had been told the bombs missed by an average of more than 100 yards (metres).

Checks are now being carried out to see if this might have been due to a software error.

Nonetheless, the Pentagon and the Royal Air Force insist that other weapons used against vital communications nodes or junctions were much more successful.

The RAF used older laser-guided bombs to hit a single target array and a Ministry of Defence spokesman in London told the BBC that they were "entirely content with their success rate".

Search BBC News Online

Advanced search options
Launch console
See also:

21 Feb 01 | Middle East
Iraq denounces sanctions review
19 Feb 01 | UK Politics
Iraqi raids 'self-defence'
20 Feb 01 | Middle East
Iraq strikes timed to 'avoid Chinese'
14 Aug 00 | UK
Bombs missed Kosovo targets
Internet links:

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

Links to more Middle East stories are at the foot of the page.

E-mail this story to a friend

Links to more Middle East stories